Return-Path: 
 <user-return-4454-apmail-uima-user-archive=uima.apache.org@uima.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A3701DEDA
	for <apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Wed,  1 Aug 2012 20:58:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 11927 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2012 20:58:41 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@uima.apache.org
Received: (qmail 11895 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2012 20:58:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@uima.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@uima.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@uima.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.uima.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@uima.apache.org
Received: (qmail 11883 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2012 20:58:41 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 20:58:41 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=FSL_RCVD_USER,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of uimaee@gmail.com designates
 209.85.161.175 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.161.175] (HELO mail-gg0-f175.google.com)
 (209.85.161.175)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 20:58:33 +0000
Received: by ggnp4 with SMTP id p4so7074179ggn.6
        for <user@uima.apache.org>; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=RBijqODKJQjmhgbuayShkNK6JmVX+hnFX/6sINKwj08=;
        b=Bs1jStKfqoXOpzwOEixbVT+q2I6vMvjVQDrWBTD/0NA7o8KIGgdRQ40/fWPeZWw9fR
         /98H7gCqiqs98V3Pj2j2huitD8qFZofIiFUa8+FjrXd/iqD3lZMNjPiV63oF3vCozb39
         4TTgUhYK6xm9lFQ6Z9t9KjDo+OXMozPWgXq56lUQe+gcWGcdRy6qXwEnYtZEtA1NVTmS
         DLOg6EiidLcu2cw0FtxsHS0wRISb2J4N7Xpn1912HOTcXENvuHRRsisOIThHrQHBcbyF
         i2IR8GMXmXSpb2+kUzGjFQtlJx0JJBu9qbI7W4dbYAwVacFSkD0CpjikSQTcbEnKCyTh
         CJ7A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.10.201 with SMTP id k9mr6713736igb.28.1343854692780; Wed,
 01 Aug 2012 13:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.164.139 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120731192235.59030@gmx.net>
References: <20120731192235.59030@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:58:12 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAO329yC8GRJxWprL+o913a==RL6pd7wk6SGBKdvpAb222EsDJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with StatusCallBackListener
From: Jaroslaw Cwiklik <uimaee@gmail.com>
To: user@uima.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae934036997cc5204c63a8d7e

--14dae934036997cc5204c63a8d7e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

If I recall, you need to modify <checkpoint> element and set "batch"
attribute to enable this
function. I think, by default this method is not called since batch=0
(default).

JC

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Christine Engelmann
<chr.engelmann@gmx.net>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I seem to have some issues with the batchProcessComplete()-method in the
> StatusCallBackListener of which I'm using an implementation in conjunction
> with a cpe. How and where do I set the corresponding batch size? Is this
> done in the chekpoint element of the cpe configuration or somewhere else?
> It seems to me that this method is never called by the system (as opposed
> to e.g. collectionProcessComplete()).
>
> Regards,
> Christine
>

--14dae934036997cc5204c63a8d7e--