Return-Path: 
 <user-return-4139-apmail-uima-user-archive=uima.apache.org@uima.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15CB29DA8
	for <apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Wed,  8 Feb 2012 08:31:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 81089 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2012 08:31:22 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@uima.apache.org
Received: (qmail 80955 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2012 08:31:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@uima.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@uima.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@uima.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.uima.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@uima.apache.org
Received: (qmail 80930 invoked by uid 99); 8 Feb 2012 08:30:55 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:30:55 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of spicoflorin@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.215.47 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.215.47] (HELO mail-lpp01m010-f47.google.com)
 (209.85.215.47)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:30:48 +0000
Received: by lahc1 with SMTP id c1so257250lah.6
        for <user@uima.apache.org>; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:30:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=HNE6JfCiWkgwNxDcvDpiP5IMBeh6nZZo3GE+evLz1hE=;
        b=rNsHxfpS36SikF4znx8yF6jEMVMSeSDKYZ8NFHwPJT29ZCPF8gIDbqWrBwFnm3Nt5m
         Vzqx8ebu0mnlHOJAqmz43E11IUPt6NMGzDWmruvKTK2SrKu1TKXcfjbl+1cCDOUZhvv0
         tBj3AyeXTr/7I0AJahehMBbk0VtwhwlCw9p0E=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.144.133 with SMTP id sm5mr14916727lab.38.1328689827006;
 Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:30:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.152.2.103 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 00:30:26 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 10:30:26 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAOy42CvGLVEcqWsnkJJTC0OCqMtQOt0VQxPuwXHCKw3PgrHCRg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Some questions about CASPool functionality
From: Spico Florin <spicoflorin@gmail.com>
To: user@uima.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f23496327c94c04b86fb594

--e89a8f23496327c94c04b86fb594
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hello!
   I would like to know how CASPool works for an AE, regarding the
following aspects:
 - when a CAS is returned to the CASPool of the AE? After is being
processed by *ALL* Analysis Engines in the pipeline or after is being
consumed by the CASConsumer?
For example:
I have a pipeline that is running parallel AEs in pipeline and one
CASConsumer (using the AdvancedFlowController)
<nameValuePair>
        <name>Flow</name>
        <value>
          <array>
              <string>OAnnotator,LAnnotator,RAnnotator
             </string>
            <string>CCASConsumer</string>
          </array>
        </value>
      </nameValuePair>

Each of those annotators has its own CASPool with different sizes. Also
OAnnotator_process_time < RAnnotator_process_ time <
LAnnotator_process_time.
 Suppose that we have one message processed by the above pipeline. In this
use case how the CASPool will behave for each of the AE? It will take into
the consideration the whole time processing
(*ALL* the AE finished to send the annotations to the consumer) or we have
the same order kept for putting CAS into the CASPool :
OAnnotator_CAS_put_in_Pool_time < RAnnotator_CAS_put_in_Pool_time <
CAS_put_in_Pool_time.

 I look forward for your answers.
  Thank you.


Regards,
  Florin

--e89a8f23496327c94c04b86fb594--