Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tommaso.teofili@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.213.47 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        b=kLL+Vr6t2LfxKh1X/mYmiVFwQb6+Ymzk/Q72RIJUGFI8FdResooYj8Vzz0p0m8DIRC
         RUzqcZJZb0tvyFJMwrx0AVtAk7Cr4dw3IxnCB4YeehoAymofqxKSXZgaVorWAilzo/Ks
         R9I9B/1ATRkVbJjHvwSej+hiwabDUfPM/nKOs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTin5zEkS+9VUiJoO6UeNfOSdeyb=Aw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4DA5904F.7060305@uni-jena.de>
 <BANLkTimYy3L+w-sQ=5E8yvWLCkXN1QOUbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <4DA59ACB.6080409@uni-jena.de> <4DA59BC3.5060301@gmail.com>
 <4DA5B0FF.4010101@uni-jena.de>
 <BANLkTin5zEkS+9VUiJoO6UeNfOSdeyb=Aw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teofili@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:24:48 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTinNcxEduzTSXtho97GFSh0XVmetxw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Sandbox: LuCas Lucene update
To: user@uima.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd381c827339904a0ce6bc2

--000e0cd381c827339904a0ce6bc2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello again Erik,
from what I've seen and tested your patch looks good, if J=F6rn's tests beh=
ave
as expected I think we can commit it.
Regards,
Tommaso

2011/4/13 Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teofili@gmail.com>

> Thanks Erik,
> I'm going to review your patch now :)
> The capabilities you mentioned are not implemented yet in Solrcas but I
> hope we can bring them there as well.
> Regads,
> Tommaso
>
> 2011/4/13 Erik F=E4=DFler <erik.faessler@uni-jena.de>
>
>>  Am 13.04.2011 14:49, schrieb J=F6rn Kottmann:
>>
>>  On 4/13/11 2:44 PM, Erik F=E4=DFler wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Hello Tommaso,
>>>>
>>>> thanks a lot for your reply :) I will follow the steps you gave me as
>>>> soon as there is a little time for this.
>>>>
>>>> Also thanks for the SolrCas hint. I think we already talked about this=
.
>>>> As far as I understood, Solrcas as well as the Solr-UIMA integration l=
ack
>>>> some of the features offered by LuCas, for example the alignment of
>>>> TokenStreams which allows you to merge multiple CAS indexes into a sin=
gle
>>>> Lucene field where position_increments are adjusted to stack Lucene to=
kens
>>>> with the same offsets. Please (!!) tell me when I'm wrong here, as I a=
m
>>>> still working on my own ways to use UIMA together with Solr.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I might have time next week to work on the Lucas component, because I
>>> also need it for a project.
>>> Maybe that would be a good chance to apply and test your patch.
>>>
>>> J=F6rn
>>>
>> Great - as its best to get things done quickly, I just updated my versio=
n
>> to the latest trunk version, made sure the tests are still running and
>> created the patch. The corresponding Jira issue can be found at
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2126
>>
>> If something is wrong with the issue, please let me know - it's the firs=
t
>> I've created (e.g. I expect the "Affects Version/s" field to not match t=
he
>> issue, but I could be wrong).
>>
>> Erik
>> **
>>
>
>

--000e0cd381c827339904a0ce6bc2--