Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99863 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2011 12:49:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Apr 2011 12:49:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 29467 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2011 12:49:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 29427 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2011 12:49:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 29419 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2011 12:49:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:49:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kottmann@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:49:31 +0000 Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so570934bwz.6 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 05:49:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=T5THsI1G2YiSLAHYZgEW/+8/kExY3iSkpLq4YDBHDzQ=; b=Ji33g9OaspW8pJQM8+ovERtwqc1YxHoodbwOTCOKSB2YT+3wW5+6IIP2cQtWoiuVW1 4ruPc4rr4prgFE5rHh/+nt+cCdGYbJrHDUN6pG9V78zW1/CXVXyl079ziOSGkpP4qIS8 fOohnqqklldO+gtabCsrL26CKYTJ+Z9ATX6YY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tXokMu0s15knL7qsDZorBwwbmUVs0yP8COI5rMSkvTCDeA/wZkK6QALHJQWDMxdl1x LmRAqDW1A1cJn84+eRTtjoewYNOM1ihOHU5CjZpFiBmufZWXX3bGrD4H8YvndnpPUAQu Pa2GReK7GcRLdHI/Kme2crKG/PdA7JddnieYg= Received: by 10.204.32.9 with SMTP id a9mr1934878bkd.182.1302698950839; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 05:49:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cphdev01.infopaq.net (dkcphfw01.infopaq.dk [213.150.59.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v21sm322938bkt.23.2011.04.13.05.49.08 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 13 Apr 2011 05:49:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DA59BC3.5060301@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:49:07 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Kottmann?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: user@uima.apache.org Subject: Re: Sandbox: LuCas Lucene update References: <4DA5904F.7060305@uni-jena.de> <4DA59ACB.6080409@uni-jena.de> In-Reply-To: <4DA59ACB.6080409@uni-jena.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 4/13/11 2:44 PM, Erik F��ler wrote: > Hello Tommaso, > > thanks a lot for your reply :) I will follow the steps you gave me as > soon as there is a little time for this. > > Also thanks for the SolrCas hint. I think we already talked about > this. As far as I understood, Solrcas as well as the Solr-UIMA > integration lack some of the features offered by LuCas, for example > the alignment of TokenStreams which allows you to merge multiple CAS > indexes into a single Lucene field where position_increments are > adjusted to stack Lucene tokens with the same offsets. Please (!!) > tell me when I'm wrong here, as I am still working on my own ways to > use UIMA together with Solr. I might have time next week to work on the Lucas component, because I also need it for a project. Maybe that would be a good chance to apply and test your patch. J�rn