uima-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Sandbox: LuCas Lucene update
Date Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:24:58 GMT
Thanks Erik,
I'm going to review your patch now :)
The capabilities you mentioned are not implemented yet in Solrcas but I hope
we can bring them there as well.

2011/4/13 Erik Fäßler <erik.faessler@uni-jena.de>

>  Am 13.04.2011 14:49, schrieb Jörn Kottmann:
>  On 4/13/11 2:44 PM, Erik Fäßler wrote:
>>>  Hello Tommaso,
>>> thanks a lot for your reply :) I will follow the steps you gave me as
>>> soon as there is a little time for this.
>>> Also thanks for the SolrCas hint. I think we already talked about this.
>>> As far as I understood, Solrcas as well as the Solr-UIMA integration lack
>>> some of the features offered by LuCas, for example the alignment of
>>> TokenStreams which allows you to merge multiple CAS indexes into a single
>>> Lucene field where position_increments are adjusted to stack Lucene tokens
>>> with the same offsets. Please (!!) tell me when I'm wrong here, as I am
>>> still working on my own ways to use UIMA together with Solr.
>> I might have time next week to work on the Lucas component, because I also
>> need it for a project.
>> Maybe that would be a good chance to apply and test your patch.
>> Jörn
> Great - as its best to get things done quickly, I just updated my version
> to the latest trunk version, made sure the tests are still running and
> created the patch. The corresponding Jira issue can be found at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2126
> If something is wrong with the issue, please let me know - it's the first
> I've created (e.g. I expect the "Affects Version/s" field to not match the
> issue, but I could be wrong).
> Erik
> **

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message