Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kottmann@gmail.com designates
 209.85.161.47 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=dAtLKAPEYlZvnImG7luLYvxYK9hjJ/XJd1u4Zc2qH7h5nVLO6zh79RCs+pueo2t7g/
         sSLpqZ8Xb8oBxoH6XOQStojOQ3aNNMDydhYGkTl+uib6B9joKHSq255A+HI0I9QvP3C/
         psq5lx0pVrgbdYwGpTJZmaBpUJ8HIcK6NW8vQ=
Message-ID: <4BFC215F.1010406@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 21:13:35 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Kottmann?= <kottmann@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: user@uima.apache.org
Subject: Re: Also the performance of UIMA AS
References: <loom.20100525T041830-874@post.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <loom.20100525T041830-874@post.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hello,

you can use a profiler to measure where the CPU time
is spent.

J�rn

feixiang wrote:
> Hello,
>    I am very interested in testting the performance of UIMA AS architecture.For 
> exemple, I want to find the AE which is the bottleneck of the system.
>    Fortunately, UIMA provides us some tools evalute the performance,such as 
> jconsole,cpe.They make me know the time spend in AE and how many CASes it 
> analyzes,but I can't use it in my code.So Is there some class to record 
> the time just like cpe.I want to record the performance of every 1000 CASes 
> the AE analyzes. Can you give me an example in AE.Thank you.
>    At the same time,I am very confused about the time spend in multiplier.In the 
> "next" method of multiplier, I build a new cas and add some annotation in it.I 
> test the time spend in "next" in two ways.First in cpe,second in UIMA 
> AS.Surprisedly,they are in sharp contrast.The time in UIMA AS are hundreds of 
> times longer than the time in cpe.I also test the time spend in multiplier,the 
> time in cpe and UIMA AS are high.So why multipler consumes so much time?
>    By the way,are there any reports about performance of UIMA AS architecture?
> Thank you so much if somebody could help me!
>
>