Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 62564 invoked from network); 26 May 2010 14:28:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 May 2010 14:28:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 9665 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2010 14:28:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 9640 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2010 14:28:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 9621 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2010 14:28:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-uima-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 9618 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2010 14:28:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 14:28:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.168.50.54] (HELO SMT02001.global-sp.net) (193.168.50.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 14:28:47 +0000 Received: from EXV01001.GlobalSP.local (unknown [172.20.30.2]) by SMT02001.global-sp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A870C6943EA for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 16:28:20 +0200 (CEST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 x-cr-puzzleid: {46667ACC-E459-4D6E-8D1D-DDE99D4F02B1} MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CAFCDF.91F69E61" x-cr-hashedpuzzle: BgwH BoeF B9rc CIrW CNCl Ct3a DYLR DnPa EEi1 FbdD FyFz GBZ3 IL2L IPub Jk+K J84U;1;dQBpAG0AYQAtAHUAcwBlAHIAQABpAG4AYwB1AGIAYQB0AG8AcgAuAGEAcABhAGMAaABlAC4AbwByAGcA;Sosha1_v1;7;{46667ACC-E459-4D6E-8D1D-DDE99D4F02B1};bQB1AG8AbgAuAGwAZQBAAHQAZQBtAGkAcwAuAGMAbwBtAA==;Wed, 26 May 2010 14:27:22 GMT;VwBoAGUAbgAgAHQAaABlACAAQwBQAEUAIABpAHMAIABrAGkAbABsAGUAZAAsACAAaQB0AHMAIAByAGUAbQBvAHQAZQAgAHAAcgBvAGMAZQBzAHMAbwByAHMAIABhAHIAZQAgAG4AbwB0ACAAawBpAGwAbABlAGQALgA= Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: When the CPE is killed, its remote processors are not killed. Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 16:27:22 +0200 Message-ID: <3D75841CCAED41408E7F85CAA9E9D29301C40845@EXV01001.GlobalSP.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: When the CPE is killed, its remote processors are not killed. Thread-Index: Acr8343dWipDOrG4Qe2fgZ4Ahtkjfg== From: "Muon Le" To: X-global-asp-net-MailScanner-ID: A870C6943EA.AF5C6 X-global-asp-net-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-global-asp-net-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-MailScanner-From: muon.le@temis.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAFCDF.91F69E61 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, =20 I start a CPE which contains local processors and remote processors. When I kill the CPE, all of local processors are immediately killed but remote processors are still processing and will be killed after processing the last CAS document.=20 And, the cpe.isProcessing() returns false just after calling cpe.kill(). =20 Do you know how to force the CPE to stop and stop all of its components without processing the current documents ? =20 Thank you for your help. =20 Muon. =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAFCDF.91F69E61--