Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-uima-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72359 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2009 19:53:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Aug 2009 19:53:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 2597 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2009 19:53:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-uima-user-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 2539 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2009 19:53:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact uima-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: uima-user@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list uima-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 2529 invoked by uid 99); 10 Aug 2009 19:53:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:53:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [130.83.156.225] (HELO lnx500.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de) (130.83.156.225) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:53:23 +0000 Received: from callisto.ntdom.tk.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de (callisto.tk.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de [130.83.163.139]) by lnx500.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de (8.14.2/8.14.2/HRZ/PMX) with ESMTP id n7AJqw5e027027 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:52:58 +0200 (envelope-from eckartde@tk.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de) Received: from [10.0.1.3] ([95.222.209.203]) by callisto.ntdom.tk.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:53:00 +0200 Message-Id: From: Richard Eckart de Castilho To: uima-user@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Are CasConsumers deprecated by AnalysisEngines? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:52:59 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Aug 2009 19:53:00.0137 (UTC) FILETIME=[2A081D90:01CA19F4] X-PMX-TU: seen v0.75 by 5.5.6.374947, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2009.8.10.194534 X-PMX-SPAMCHECK: outgoing mail X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello everybody, recently the question of replacing all our CasConsumers with =20 AnalysisEngines comes up quite frequently and the potential myth that =20= CasCosumers should no longer be used and instead AnalysisEngines =20 should be preferred crops up every once in a while. I tried finding a =20= definitive information about this in the mailing list archives, but I =20= did not. In 2007 Adam Lally stated: > In recent versions of UIMA there is essentially no difference =20 > between an AnalysisEngine and a CasConsumer I think at least in CPEs it makes a difference, since with the first =20 CasConsumer the CPE supposed to be run in a single thread, so the =20 CasConsumer sees all the documents. The CPE, however, is afaik =20 deprecated and replaced by UIMA AS. If an AnalysisEngine has "allow multiple deployment" set to "false", =20 that should have the same affect within a CPE or within UIMA AS. So the questions are: - Is there any reason why CasConsumers are still required? - Is there any reason that a CasConsumer cannot be replaced "as =20 is" (minus inheriting from a different base class and changing the =20 descriptor type) by an AnalysisEngine that may not be deployed multiply? Best regards, Richard Eckart de Castilho --=20 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Richard Eckart de Castilho Software Engineer Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing Lab FB 20 Computer Science Department Technische Universit=E4t Darmstadt Hochschulstr. 10, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany phone +49 (6151) 16 - 6218, fax -5455, room S2/02/E225 eckartde@tk.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de www.ukp.tu-darmstadt.de -------------------------------------------------------------------