uima-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marshall Schor <...@schor.com>
Subject Re: Are CasConsumers deprecated by AnalysisEngines?
Date Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:22:06 GMT


Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> recently the question of replacing all our CasConsumers with
> AnalysisEngines comes up quite frequently and the potential myth that
> CasCosumers should no longer be used and instead AnalysisEngines
> should be preferred crops up every once in a while. I tried finding a
> definitive information about this in the mailing list archives, but I
> did not.
>
> In 2007 Adam Lally stated:
>
>> In recent versions of UIMA there is essentially no difference between
>> an AnalysisEngine and a CasConsumer
>
> I think at least in CPEs it makes a difference, since with the first
> CasConsumer the CPE supposed to be run in a single thread, so the
> CasConsumer sees all the documents. The CPE, however, is afaik
> deprecated and replaced by UIMA AS.
>
> If an AnalysisEngine has "allow multiple deployment" set to "false",
> that should have the same affect within a CPE or within UIMA AS.
>
> So the questions are:
>
> - Is there any reason why CasConsumers are still required?
>
> - Is there any reason that a CasConsumer cannot be replaced "as is"
> (minus inheriting from a different base class and changing the
> descriptor type) by an AnalysisEngine that may not be deployed multiply?

I think this is basically correct.  The one thing I'm not completely
sure of because I haven't checked (:-) ) is whether calling something a
Cas Consumer moves the component in the default flow to the end of the
pipe line, in a CPE.  In UIMA-AS, it doesn't, I think..

-Marshall
>
> Best regards,
>
> Richard Eckart de Castilho
>

Mime
View raw message