Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-uima-user-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 34659 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2007 19:10:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Nov 2007 19:10:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 18005 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2007 19:10:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-uima-user-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 17989 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2007 19:10:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact uima-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: uima-user@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list uima-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 17969 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2007 19:10:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 11:10:26 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.148.227.153] (HELO rwcrmhc13.comcast.net) (216.148.227.153) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:11:05 +0000 Received: from rmailcenter15.comcast.net ([204.127.197.125]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id <20071108191007m1300bpuv9e>; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 19:10:07 +0000 Received: from [204.50.113.28] by rmailcenter15.comcast.net; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:10:07 +0000 From: holmberg2066@comcast.net (greg@holmberg.name) To: uima-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: Status of the C++ enablement layer Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:10:07 +0000 Message-Id: <110820071910.6514.47335F0F000610BE000019722205886172C0C0CFCD099D0A0D03040108@comcast.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Oct 30 2007) X-Authenticated-Sender: aG9sbWJlcmcyMDY2QGNvbWNhc3QubmV0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi guys-- I'm wondering what the status of the C++ enablement layer is for Apache UIMA 2.2? I don't see it in either the binary or source distributions. I've come to the point where I need a certain C++ library for which I had written a C++ annotator in UIMA 1.x. So I can either migrate it to UIMA 2.x C++ or write a JNI interface for it and a Java annotator. I'd prefer to do the first and keep it as a C++ annotator (less work). So what's the plan for releasing the C++ enablement layer? Thanks, Greg Holmberg