Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-tuscany-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 84045 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2008 20:06:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Feb 2008 20:06:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 75956 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2008 20:06:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-tuscany-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 75737 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2008 20:06:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 75728 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2008 20:06:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 12:06:45 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [195.212.29.157] (HELO mtagate8.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.157) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:06:29 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate8.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m14K6MZY089794 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 20:06:22 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m14K6MbY2056216 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:06:22 +0100 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m14K6MAc030872 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:06:22 +0100 Received: from [9.146.148.82] ([9.146.148.82]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m14K6LCd030860 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:06:21 +0100 Message-ID: <47A7703C.4080202@apache.org> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:06:20 +0000 From: Simon Nash User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: Graduation next steps References: <71e1b5740801310541m7c74b1aamc00e38805cba81fd@mail.gmail.com> <47A57370.5010200@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <47A57370.5010200@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: > Matthieu Riou wrote: > >(cut) > > What you've said sounds good, here's a few more suggestions. > > JIRAs, patches and features: > > - cleanup and organize JIRAs to help people find where to contribute > +1 > - apply patches from contributors more quickly > +1 > - have a roadmap with features, their status and who's working on them > +1 > Mailing lists: > > - route the JIRA traffic out of the dev list as suggested by Matthieu > I understand that this traffic can get a bit overwhelming at times, but I'd like to make the case that it does have value for new developers (though not for users). One of the best ways to start down the path to becoming a contributor and committer is through writing or fixing JIRAs. Having the JIRA traffic appear on the dev list helps people to see what JIRAs others are writing and can encourage new contributors to jump in with a comment or a fix, or to write other JIRAs themselves. > - improve mailing list communication with shorter and clearer emails > This is a good idea, and will help improve many of our mailing list exchanges. It does raise the question of what do we do when we need to have some in-depth discussion that might be a bit rambling with a few blind alleys along the way. Can this be done effectively with scheduled IRC chats, as we used to have? My recollection is that we did not usually discuss or resolve deep technical topics on these chats. What about phone calls? (This is what my company would do in such cases.) I have an account that offers worldwide toll-free access numbers, so cost wouldn't be an issue, but this isn't considered the Apache Way because of time zone issues and scheduling conflicts. What do people think is the best way to conduct this other kind of deeper discussion? > - post everything that's useful to users to the user list > I think this is something we definitely need to do. Too much discussion of user-related topics happens on the dev list by default, and gets mixed in with the JIRA traffic and deep technical discussions that were mentioned in the above discussion topics. If we could make this change, I don't think having JIRA trraffic on the dev list would be the problem it is today. > Documentation: > > - provide better architecture and design docs > +1 > - publish more tutorials and how-to docs to help users get on board > +1 Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org