tuscany-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Sebastien Delfino <jsdelf...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Bypassing unnecessary transforms by Tuscany databinding framework
Date Wed, 20 Feb 2008 01:13:14 GMT
Scott Kurz wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2008 7:03 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <jsdelfino@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> I still wonder whether it's a good or bad assumption to assume the
>>> DTInterceptor always does a copy, since I found a use for it when it
>>> did not (but again that was a more ugly use).
>>>
>> I wouldn't make that assumption as it depends on the nature of the
>> transformation but with the new design the interceptor gets to decide
>> and give the proper answer, no assumption is needed.
>> --
>>
>> Jean-Sebastien
>>
> 
> Not sure if I got my last point across.   I was pointing out that
> DTInterceptor now has hard-coded:
> 
>     public boolean allowsPassByReference() {
>         return true;
>     }
> 
> This implies that if DTInterceptor is set up on the wire, the
> PBVInterceptor will never do a copy.   If you don't agree
> with that assumption either then maybe the code should be changed.
> 

We're talking about the same thing, I'm not sure that DTInterceptor 
should always return true without looking at the nature of the 
transformation :)

-- 
Jean-Sebastien

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Mime
View raw message