Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-tuscany-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 97761 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2007 15:45:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Dec 2007 15:45:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 34777 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2007 15:45:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-tuscany-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 34466 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2007 15:45:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 34457 invoked by uid 99); 9 Dec 2007 15:45:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 07:45:14 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of for.svkrish@gmail.com designates 209.85.146.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.146.177] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 15:44:53 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k22so2972126waf for ; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 07:44:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=stBwqstfIcuz8ExS7rB+YYfhbJQXCxO0Zq0fZUUdvlA=; b=B0tdrDeUITweouGk4Sf9QXiezB16+0ImiYru10om7LLgEEzdWHNzw5OEA9pC+bRQLq3q5HKULbMMqrqucf7ob7jCgxnTkSiebdOpim7gSF2ZV9TCGMnNp4ot4QByAuf9Jtzaqw6cOKRCC9HHBQ4P8Auv/wGLzN0NnEbP9ZVTSIo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=KLSuKWb3IrMTA/YfIYtAq1dzsBEe+ujk2tSN0iNaQElLxxxnGEM5r17nzS9ZSEhZqGQc02whGHGwIuPpIBaZSyDCpJyaNUq7saK2Lirf/Gc92cBplY0UG4kMSBFNPKsZyT/CbTmAHaToUC2fd1foH8OSK091Q75FUY7LVPR3td4= Received: by 10.114.109.1 with SMTP id h1mr1346005wac.1197215092814; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 07:44:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.208.18 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Dec 2007 07:44:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <33e260400712090744o2f5b5f3dl43ab8ad1ada470ff@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 21:14:52 +0530 From: "Venkata Krishnan" To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org, antelder@apache.org Subject: Re: What is Tuscany? In-Reply-To: <71e1b5740712080451y4d688520w569b2e6b4f7a470d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_19924_8166733.1197215092797" References: <04cd01c838f5$1b8b34f0$7daa4109@rfengt60p> <71e1b5740712080451y4d688520w569b2e6b4f7a470d@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_19924_8166733.1197215092797 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi, Yes. I've also been asked a few times about how Tuscany compares with ESB. If not for anything it would be good atleast from the standpoint of positioning Tuscany vs ESB. Are there any documentation that positions SCA vis-a-vis ESB ? - Venkat On Dec 8, 2007 6:21 PM, ant elder wrote: > (forwarded to dev list from user list to discuss this esb aspect) > > I'm interested in this ESB aspect and wonder wouldn't it be good to have > some sort of ESB like thing as part of Tuscany. You can use SCA in an > ESB, > Tuscany with all its bindings and implementation types has a lot of > similar > functionality to other open source ESBs. Its quite a big leap to get > people > to switch to using Tuscany/SCA for developing entire applications so > having > something like a "Tuscany ESB" could provide a stepping stone to give > people > exposure to SCA without such a big up front commitment. > > Does anyone else think this is an area worth exploring? > > ...ant > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Raymond Feng > Date: Dec 7, 2007 5:17 PM > Subject: Re: What is Tuscany? > To: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org > > > > > Tuscany is not an ESB offering. My understanding is that it's closer to > the > business application developers by providing a service assembly model and > programming model. The ESB will provide the flexible IT infrastructure > that > composite applications can be deployed. > ------=_Part_19924_8166733.1197215092797--