From users-return-7760-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@trafficserver.apache.org Sun May 12 14:18:37 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id F32DF18062F for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 16:18:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 44065 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2019 14:18:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@trafficserver.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@trafficserver.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@trafficserver.apache.org Received: (qmail 44047 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2019 14:18:36 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO mailrelay2-lw-us.apache.org) (10.10.3.159) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 May 2019 14:18:36 +0000 Received: from [10.6.6.212] (unknown [208.84.155.215]) by mailrelay2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 6C20F4096; Sun, 12 May 2019 14:18:32 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Move from the IRC to Slack From: Leif Hedstrom X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16E227) In-Reply-To: <43BF57A9-643A-4BAD-AD42-6F77CEC1075A@me.com> Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 08:18:31 -0600 Cc: users@trafficserver.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <837334E3-5EFB-4E22-9189-E6E6C0FF3C2B@apache.org> <43BF57A9-643A-4BAD-AD42-6F77CEC1075A@me.com> To: dev@trafficserver.apache.org > On May 11, 2019, at 23:35, James Peach wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 >> On May 12, 2019, at 3:32 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: >>=20 >> Note that this is the ASF workspace, not just ATS. Automating account cre= ations here seems like a bad idea, but I guess you can run it by the ASF inf= ra ops. My guess would be that they say no :-). >=20 > So users won=E2=80=99t be able to join and participate unless they have so= me out of band way to ask for an invite? If that=E2=80=99s the case, I don=E2= =80=99t think this is a good idea. You think it=E2=80=99s a serious burden to send an email to e.g. users@ or d= ev@ and ask for an invite? Doesn=E2=80=99t seems a whole lot more burdensome= than going to a website that you must find. =E2=80=94 Leif=20 >=20 >>=20 >> Cheers, >>=20 >> =E2=80=94 Leif=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>> On May 11, 2019, at 23:26, James Peach wrote: >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>> On May 12, 2019, at 4:57 AM, Evan Zelkowitz wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> +1 >>>>=20 >>>> Though it would be nice if there was an easier way to get new people >>>> in rather than having to manually invite them. My only worry is people >>>> who just want to ask a question dont have an easy way to be able to >>>> get in. So maybe there should be some change on the site to notify >>>> that they should request access on the mailing list or something like >>>> that >>>=20 >>> Most project use https://github.com/rauchg/slackin to automatically issu= e invites. We should do that here as well. >>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 5:45 PM Bryan Call wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>> I would like to propose that we move from the IRC to Slack for IM comm= unication by June 1st. This is in response to ASF moving to Slack for Infra= and other channels and spamming that has happened on the IRC over the last y= ear. >>>>>=20 >>>>> This would require that people without an apache.org email address to b= e invited. We would keep the IRC channel open after the migration to notify= people of the Slack channel. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Link to the ASF Workspace: >>>>> https://the-asf.slack.com >>>>>=20 >>>>> Channel on Slack: >>>>> #traffic-server >>>>>=20 >>>>> -Bryan >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >=20