Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7518419E74 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:31:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23051 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2016 16:31:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@trafficserver.apache.org Received: (qmail 22934 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2016 16:31:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@trafficserver.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@trafficserver.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@trafficserver.apache.org Received: (qmail 22916 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2016 16:31:35 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:31:35 +0000 Received: from mail-io0-f180.google.com (mail-io0-f180.google.com [209.85.223.180]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 828D21A0040; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:31:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f180.google.com with SMTP id q128so28585738iof.3; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:31:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJI0hVhFv0zw+An5yCJ3jKVLGUF6vlM4TDzwPiygnT1fuWSfNj3gno0OXBxoPUr/vXGTXpIT4wvz2ldgxg== X-Received: by 10.107.7.18 with SMTP id 18mr3569632ioh.78.1459269094317; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:31:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Phil Sorber Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:31:25 +0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: ATS Release Branch 4.2.x EOL To: "dev@trafficserver.apache.org" , "users@trafficserver.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f905c001602052f3290b4 --001a113f905c001602052f3290b4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hopefully this doesn't come as a shock to anyone, but we need to EOL the 4.2.x release branch. 4.2.0 was released on March 19th 2014 according to the STATUS file. Originally we discussed 1 year timespan, but then extended it to 1.5 years. That puts us at September 19th 2015. So technically we are already EOL on it, but since I can't find anything on record I am going to propose 30 days until EOL. If I did the math right, that puts us at April 28th 2016. Are there any objections to this? Thanks. --001a113f905c001602052f3290b4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hopefully this doesn't come as a shock to anyone, but = we need to EOL the 4.2.x release branch. 4.2.0 was released on March 19th 2= 014 according to the STATUS file. Originally we discussed 1 year timespan, = but then extended it to 1.5 years. That puts us at September 19th 2015. So = technically we are already EOL on it, but since I can't find anything o= n record I am going to propose 30 days until EOL. If I did the math right, = that puts us at April 28th 2016. Are there any objections to this?

=
Thanks.
--001a113f905c001602052f3290b4--