Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 519F918A27 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:42:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3557 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2015 15:42:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@trafficserver.apache.org Received: (qmail 3501 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2015 15:42:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@trafficserver.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@trafficserver.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@trafficserver.apache.org Received: (qmail 3491 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2015 15:42:00 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 15:42:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5CDDB1828C7 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:42:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.129 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.129 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yKM8IQA37_67 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 144C124C0F for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbcao8 with SMTP id ao8so13471312lbc.3 for ; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 08:41:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6BJNjJwIHKr3QWTWqQzobAZk57Fuy4oTxajhFfhwMuY=; b=OvxbLoynZ5mLJAOBa7nW2gn/ySvcy8gU9y+N3/a8qeVI7ykGFEN619M1uy/n4nYNix aX0oUJeSELs+0OKCI+IyqOUCzl2F+h5NIuXUZUD2rX4zcw+h9MVKk+iK3UZXjgWT8cUZ aCQtx+znPzikc6XQMjUMtcFrzDZQpAcdGwDiNp9QoNho+PMqZm2ITIG3WQkNH1xSz+Mp IytbZZO0DLWfOabVf9D+CCHlPoQk8oesHVuI6Z5d5Q2gqPpxpFY5/PCMCxzFCIh3Q0uv PZkPW+boQZhQjbh/5CcaR0LvYwAMFjNYHa1/4L1dYJTpJkWCSezuqWjgCTLPJ/iAQbmv B2Gw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.25.39 with SMTP id z7mr4411455lbf.102.1441381318281; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 08:41:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.45.200 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 08:41:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 10:41:58 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Multiple Plugins vs Lua From: Jason Strongman To: users@trafficserver.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Is the ATS community moving from stitching together multiple plugins and placing all that functionality into a lua script ? Consider the below plugins in a reverse proxy, per remap configuration. regex_revalidate geoacl header_rewrite urlsig Instead of calling all these plugins, and praying for cooperation, I could take the same instructions(in lua of course) and call them from within a lua script. If I go by the Lua plugin presentation seen out there in the wild, there shouldnt be too much of a performance penalty.. Will have to test this out of course. Am I way off base here or am I making a little bit of sense ?