Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11998185E6 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 22:32:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14514 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2015 22:32:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@trafficserver.apache.org Received: (qmail 14455 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2015 22:32:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@trafficserver.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@trafficserver.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@trafficserver.apache.org Received: (qmail 14438 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2015 22:32:10 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 22:32:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 367D7CBCB4; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 22:32:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.98 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.98 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d0bB8Nl_kE1H; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 22:32:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-in6.apple.com (mail-out6.apple.com [17.151.62.28]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id A445C43BAB; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 22:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay6.apple.com (relay6.apple.com [17.128.113.90]) by mail-in6.apple.com (Apple Secure Mail Relay) with SMTP id 26.69.09025.B5322755; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 15:31:55 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11973e15-f79fd6d000002341-f4-5572235bfc7c Received: from russet.apple.com (russet.apple.com [17.171.2.67]) (using TLS with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay6.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 8D.03.06004.2F412755; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 14:30:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [17.168.170.28] (unknown [17.168.170.28]) by russet.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.30.0 64bit (built Oct 22 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NPH005FFT95OV30@russet.apple.com>; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 15:31:54 -0700 (PDT) Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE/DISCUSS] Removing support for Debian6 and Ubuntu12 From: Leif Hedstrom In-reply-to: <9514DB89-06D8-4377-9922-A4E7DE5B8F23@apache.org> Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 18:31:53 -0400 Cc: users@trafficserver.apache.org Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Message-id: <4D6EE9C8-37A0-41D1-96FD-B7AE08F806FC@apache.org> References: <713F8286-306D-4AAD-9F37-B48FECEAA49D@apache.org> <9514DB89-06D8-4377-9922-A4E7DE5B8F23@apache.org> To: dev@trafficserver.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrKLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FAYpRutXBRqcPwll8WNxvnMFus3HWRz YPJ4vvUfWwBjFJdNSmpOZllqkb5dAlfGhF8PWAtm8VdsmnOFvYFxK08XIyeHhICJxN8L29kh bDGJC/fWs3UxcnEICexllPjSf4kRpmjvv8msEIkJTBKr/x1hhHB+M0ps/P4NKMPBwSygLjFl Si5IA6+AnsSc6wvYQGxhAU+JVfcegQ1iE1CTePJ5PQuIzSlgJ9G0+SOYzSKgKjGzE8JmFlCS uH6wjxHC1pZ48u4CK8RMW4n2K11gNUIChRITl25kBrFFBBQkfr6fwA5ygoSArMTXrXIgp0kI /GSVaDs2jXUCo/AshOtmIbluFpINCxiZVzEK5SZm5uhm5pnpJRYU5KTqJefnbmIEhfN0O9Ed jGdWWR1iFOBgVOLhbTAsDBViTSwrrsw9xCjNwaIkzjtRtChUSCA9sSQ1OzW1ILUovqg0J7X4 ECMTB6dUA6OIzET29o3deT11lkVKcw49Pvgxs1vgTqumyuxXi3LU+oSLtmnKXrfXn27urbH7 cLPBwuqiFLkFbRnXF7m8WD35Q0V2bXpaYKv2OastU+qY+VoVCjxaP/cduimluXlKlMD6lS/n iCfbPfv5gynCfu/l+XWeVt6rZ8kca48U3XRlcaeu3lemv0osxRmJhlrMRcWJAMujX7dIAgAA X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrBLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiuJrJWfeTSFGowfL1chY3GuczW6zfdJDN gcnj+dZ/bAGMUVw2Kak5mWWpRfp2CVwZE349YC2YxV+xac4V9gbGrTxdjJwcEgImEnv/TWaF sMUkLtxbz9bFyMUhJDCBSWL1vyOMEM5vRomN378BVXFwMAuoS0yZkgvSwCugJzHn+gI2EFtY wFNi1b1HjCA2m4CaxJPP61lAbE4BO4mmzR/BbBYBVYmZnRA2s4CSxPWDfYwQtrbEk3cXWCFm 2kq0X+kCqxESKJSYuHQjM4gtIqAg8fP9BHaQEyQEZCW+bpWbwCgwC+GgWUgOmoVk6AJG5lWM AkWpOYmVZnqJBQU5qXrJ+bmbGEHh11AYtYOxYbnVIUYBDkYlHt4C5cJQIdbEsuLK3EOMEhzM SiK80RJFoUK8KYmVValF+fFFpTmpxYcYpTlYlMR5d67IDRUSSE8sSc1OTS1ILYLJMnFwSjUw dnvwsKU4iSZ8fFCifz91tkfKnPmqci1FRt2M4bfqZ/Ok2H+5kyw/9XF76DH3ko+rr7t8mjHr jo/B4a0nVGROrPDhFG2M/6lgOWsCs6Ol7rTyR+Z9u5OjJKIK3l+wTk1q3iIhd2zTD1/f2vJe LcN8/mNGp/3Tp5d9iT25+nfexIb9rQk7jTiVWIozEg21mIuKEwFzRNwYOwIAAA== > On Jun 5, 2015, at 3:30 PM, James Peach wrote: >=20 >=20 >> On Jun 5, 2015, at 10:25 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: >>=20 >> Hi all, >>=20 >> In addition to removing build support for RHEL5 (and derivatives), I = think we need to ditch Debian6 and Ubuntu12 as well. Debian6 comes, from = what I can tell, with OpenSSL 0.9.8, and Ubuntu12 comes with = OpenSSL1.0.0. The minimum version we=E2=80=99ve said to support, as = defined by RHEL6, is OpenSSL v1.0.1. >=20 > In the previous vote, the package list was specified as: >=20 > gcc-4.4.7-11.el6.x86_64 > openssl-1.0.1e-30.el6.8.x86_64 > bison-2.4.1-5.el6.x86_64 > pcre-7.8-6.el6.x86_64 > hwloc-1.5-3.el6_5.x86_64 > libxml2-2.7.6-17.el6_6.1.x86_64 > tcl-8.5.7-6.el6.x86_64 > zlib-1.2.3-29.el6.x86_64 > libcap-2.16-5.5.el6.x86_64 > xz-libs-4.999.9-0.5.beta.20091007git.el6.x86_64 > glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.5.x86_64 Which is the list from RHEL6, our =E2=80=9Cminimum viable OS release=E2=80= =9D. The point of picking RHEL6 was exactly to avoid whack-a-mole. = It=E2=80=99s perfectly clear from our decision to support RHEL6 and up, = which versions of the packages we require. It seems that Ubuntu12 is just confused, and does indeed have OpenSSL = 1.0.1, even though their library / package name is 1.0.0. So, we can = continue to support Ubuntu12 it seems. As for Debian 6, I don=E2=80=99t know if we=E2=80=99re doing something = wrong there, but I can not get it to install anything newer than OpenSSL = 0.9.8 (and, we are in fact currently broken on the builds). >=20 > Rather than playing whack-a-mole with OS versions, let's verify the = actual dependencies. We also need an up to date and accessible support = page, since = https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TS/Supported+Operating+Systems= is hard to find and out of date. Yes, that needs to be updated. =E2=80=94 Leif