Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 221AC17B58 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 23:45:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81035 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2014 23:45:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@trafficserver.apache.org Received: (qmail 80977 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2014 23:45:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@trafficserver.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@trafficserver.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@trafficserver.apache.org Received: (qmail 80967 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2014 23:45:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 23:45:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of prvs=3708b6df1=czhenggu@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.81 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.81] (HELO esv4-mav05.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.81) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 23:45:18 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim1024; t=1414453519; x=1445989519; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Oeoy1WJXbMPk52ASohXDMI4BDtHFGfHZkv6I32LtNDk=; b=OmyMTtTQJCeWfPrZphZ3WPnwQWoGgEV0t8RfJ1QYx7wIAjll7gvXbo7o bKIwRh4yUeXMr7vt0ghxfIwvqw9FJFRR0bFSSDvd9oEe2D3IKeuo6PgOY pAb5rdibU0LlyYFagpd3TEj1YT43P9PW7Ab+1ruaxm637If+CaneSk/DS g=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,798,1406617200"; d="scan'208";a="155286403" Received: from esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.60) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:44:58 -0700 Received: from ESV4-MBX02.linkedin.biz ([fe80::20f1:6264:6880:7fc7]) by esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:44:57 -0700 From: Cynthia Gu To: "users@trafficserver.apache.org" Subject: Re: ET_NET Consistently at 6-18% CPU Utilization Thread-Topic: ET_NET Consistently at 6-18% CPU Utilization Thread-Index: AQHP8j0Ftj5SADEGzEuY2T4c8ltgbZxEm5UA Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 23:44:56 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.253] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <5F4D0A350C6B77478B3B3CF54873395F@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Set the following line in record.config may give you more info in diags: CONFIG proxy.config.diags.debug.enabled INT 1 On 10/27/14, 4:22 PM, "Jason J. W. Williams" wrote: >Seeing an odd issue on the new Ubuntu 14.04 boxes we're loading with >Traffic Server 4.2.1.1. The [ET_NET 0] process runs consistently at >6-18% CPU utilization with no traffic being processed. The exact % >depends on the CPU speed (e.g. a 2.1 GHz 8-core box runs at 18%, a >2.93GHz 8-core runs at 6%). > >For comparison a 2-core 2.0GHz old Opteron box with a moderate load is >running 0-5% CPU...but it's running Ubuntu 10.04. > >Not sure how to track down the cause because the logs are quiet. > > >-J