Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E8ECDF07 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20973 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2012 10:22:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@trafficserver.apache.org Received: (qmail 20252 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2012 10:22:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@trafficserver.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@trafficserver.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@trafficserver.apache.org Received: (qmail 20188 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2012 10:22:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:22:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ming.zym@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.42] (HELO mail-pb0-f42.google.com) (209.85.160.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:22:41 +0000 Received: by mail-pb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id ro2so4081807pbb.29 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 03:22:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:content-type:x-mailer:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OBZcfqliAnzJ+rz3Aoji5qGGZBE62G/ZcCnmrdcaZ7U=; b=07CLf3Id/9YtIqWXZjtezEzN8Q7w18+lbvDPIvL5ydJq1xtXopRTx4j8pFQ+e6lqdA +ihAiGLUqfQhv9StvCeqJi27eZg9nrgoRoVr+KjiG53EBXRb4wF/1mf1zsB5NFiBbkAD 2i9ZwC+lp9vST/VUwMS9b/r5obZ8X2Sn9A2xXrTZifFtvbEmUVPX7nE4LO6ZsOCLxrle 4yK4SqQ6q1GvoU40QtxsgSehTG+CguD04xqnl0fDdS2n2uw8oAAv6A7iv0ZdWepAQgwp hMipZRhdVwivR290GHN+wrJWjd1zJ950vdXjSyzDAEXjL/Se6V0hfeiEjHBT6XnBBAZW 1P7A== Received: by 10.68.252.168 with SMTP id zt8mr61975531pbc.43.1351506139867; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 03:22:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.32.228.73] ([182.92.247.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id iu8sm5776635pbc.71.2012.10.29.03.22.17 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 03:22:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1351506134.26326.23.camel@zym6400> Subject: prepare for the parent config revolution From: "ming.zym@gmail.com" To: users@trafficserver.apache.org Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:22:14 +0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org hi, all I think the parent proxy in parent.config will be a good solution for cache system sibling, when you runing complex content network. If you need the parent fuction, please help me understand what's your need, and what you'd like the parent to be. Currently I am thinking of making some change in the way the parent works. We are thinking of the following requirements: 1, add 'Weight' for each parent host, then we can control the traffic for each parent. 2, add 'Priority' for each parent host, then we get two or more parents responsible for each 'Priority', for high availability 3, merge DNS SRV into parent, and make SRV in parent only or parent configurable. thanks -- Zhao Yongming aka: zym @ apache.org, yonghao @ taobao.com