Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AB5A9181 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:55:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95072 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2012 19:55:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@trafficserver.apache.org Received: (qmail 93950 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2012 19:55:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@trafficserver.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@trafficserver.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@trafficserver.apache.org Received: (qmail 93051 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2012 19:55:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:55:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.91.79] (HELO nm9.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com) (98.139.91.79) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:54:58 +0000 Received: from [98.139.91.66] by nm9.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Apr 2012 19:54:37 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.17] by tm6.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Apr 2012 19:54:37 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1017.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Apr 2012 19:54:37 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 80968.88609.bm@omp1017.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 75579 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Apr 2012 19:54:36 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1335210876; bh=q+EsrEgtV7z57wED18XrfVz2prbpu9X3u6MZRXEN2MM=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=JUNSfGMdx4uvMDHuYzqXxumt7nO0zIqVhBihaqrVmk/sl+PUJ/YRXnLcGiW5H+C/7LjNd9/j1+UvHRhjs5W7ERQMthX0CHlUNzC9mDxWq1yhUhvy9BrTwtwAJVEXJTB1j/7CAHZUNxyV77BjA/d31U/ZpLkkfLBfX1sBItfz7eU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=sL4B1cPJE7CoVwNVIZVP+2rkjmfKwUk8axsIrRNwe1XgWJobS76rTH2FNX6nEvr5Pu3+VrJLenPTMqQI/GGi1ZgfzSBk1VUzKkWQpkMhRLxSBV7BPtejDKLNnmlWyKluVMLS4thILTtty17urNmBap4pFcauNnZNvvYqcfw6F5Q=; X-YMail-OSG: fBmIPiMVM1nDZhAh693xlqIaImOzODsZ8IE59FwmqdbA0xc HVkz0TR3tfZO0fQmWj7Tz4UlPcREx_dWEGFw.U3aArpfo5ZYdtEXT0heoNb. dUCZz551_2K9Tlcwi5JfxRkt4MXP8OXoenev1Hdw3uRXhQGOh6OX1v49SxZq 7RV.yoqkjaJMZh6LYR9IyZEBD.U1Cu0Wj2ayzGsQa1D_ebpO5TPvDpMxomnW 9Bkzrv2vvENQHERQmGg7HbTBHSl6HvcdEEUQrz_Zfi5rJ8gCualLJ7g4BYpc wWtTb8iRWTFVT76ZZdt3hmombMrYH3WyMr2JRAkw0UzE3gCFNeIoVJF2j68w i8SgFnxIsb5f24LUi_RkZSSzdkcA4Q0p9z0oOwXvF.3sL4erOFrf3VDsikfI XTHR9D6ctFdQet2XxcuPr.GGAd9NcLOAzqQiYMW2yyjLLk7Ekfck5mgIOCDT b2svieirhBrTPV6TQOvhzM4Hdc23pzWlB7Lb2IKcg5FpsFygH._hToRPip78 qOjkckeCelDbrbE7_2EuLU4Xidw1rD7Vo5IJjNBbAD8kro64- Received: from [17.203.114.117] by web31803.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:54:36 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.118.349524 References: <1335203106.91328.YahooMailNeo@web31803.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4F95B0A7.9090404@apache.org> Message-ID: <1335210876.62876.YahooMailNeo@web31803.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:54:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Bruce Lysik Reply-To: Bruce Lysik Subject: Re: http byte range requests get cached and served from cache? To: "users@trafficserver.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <4F95B0A7.9090404@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > Hi guys,=0A>> =0A>> Can someone tell me the current state of ATS and http= byte range requests?=0A>> =0A>> I have a system (libtorrent http seeding) = that we put ATS in front of.=A0 Files are retrieved via 512k byte range req= uests for each large file.=A0 I would expect that after fully receiving a f= ile, subsequent downloads via this mechanism would be cached.=A0 I'm not se= eing that in practice.=0A>> I found this bug: https://issues.apache.org/jir= a/browse/TS-475=0A>=0A>Yeah, that's the "performance" issue.=0A>> =0A>> But= I can't tell what the means to serving byte range requests right now.=0A>= =0A>Well, if all you see are Range: requests, and nothing ever fetches the = full object, it never gets cached :/. Until we fix TS-475 though, I don't t= hink anyone has cared about this problem, but there is at least one bug fil= led about this (to trigger a background fill of the full object on a Range:= request, assuming of course the object is cacheable)=0A=0A=0AOkay, so if I= /do/ pull down the full object, the byte range requests will be served fro= m cache? =A0I'm going to test that now. =A0=0A=0AThanks!=0A