Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A3211028B for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 19:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94839 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2013 19:30:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 94734 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2013 19:30:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 94725 invoked by uid 99); 2 Aug 2013 19:30:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 19:30:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of 1983-01-06@gmx.net designates 212.227.17.22 as permitted sender) Received: from [212.227.17.22] (HELO mout.gmx.net) (212.227.17.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 19:30:33 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.4] ([93.219.116.71]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M34eJ-1UEToZ3r8R-00ssiM for ; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 21:30:13 +0200 Message-ID: <51FC08C3.4080304@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 21:30:11 +0200 From: Michael-O <1983-01-06@gmx.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Apache Tomcat 8.0.0-RC1 release vote started References: <51FACC45.2040902@apache.org> <51FB4EC4.3020405@gmx.net> <77e8bae0-6d84-4ec5-9211-bd099de54d25@email.android.com> <51FC05BB.1040109@gmx.net> <99C8B2929B39C24493377AC7A121E21FC5AE8EE58B@USEA-EXCH8.na.uis.unisys.com> In-Reply-To: <99C8B2929B39C24493377AC7A121E21FC5AE8EE58B@USEA-EXCH8.na.uis.unisys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:aPHDUa0ApCkNIlDuJeTTF3e6js4F5nzfEHAoiEKlfIH0efRNDAP BnrIhuhorB+bFA+Yx1wCDVfizlObzlBMLFX/w4wde6uMkOJifZ0KPETGe1uTQmxVQlQebuw F+2mmXIZubsDYVjTnTeyAXzZqeMzNHSYCQrDp6MyGV7fJr6MjdlNxbJqTgC0kr+5o9ZOfFp oyCh1W6PWyVU4clsbdYGw== X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Am 2013-08-02 21:26, schrieb Caldarale, Charles R: >> From: Michael-O [mailto:1983-01-06@gmx.net] Subject: Re: Apache >> Tomcat 8.0.0-RC1 release vote started > >> According to Apache's JIRA DBCP2 is still in the works whereas >> Tomcat JDBC Pool already works quite well. If so, I would favor the >> first option and make Tomcat JDBC Pool the default. > > Your original message implied that the Tomcat JDBC pool was the > "relic" you wanted to get rid of: > >> Why if we do have the wonderful Tomcat JDBC Pool? Can't we get rid >> of that relic? > > Since the most recent noun in the wording before "that relic" was > "Tomcat JDBC Pool", I certainly interpreted "relic" as a reference to > Filip's creation, not the original DBCP - and I suspect Mark T did as > well. Oh ok, sorry for that misunderstanding. "Relic" solely referred to Commons DBCP and *not* Tomcat JDBC Pool. This obviously happened because I am not a native English speaker. Michael --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org