Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 48123 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2006 17:27:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Aug 2006 17:27:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 32798 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2006 17:27:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 32672 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2006 17:27:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 32636 invoked by uid 99); 9 Aug 2006 17:27:01 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:27:01 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.21.53.35] (HELO talk.nabble.com) (72.21.53.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:27:01 -0700 Received: from [72.21.53.38] (helo=jubjub.nabble.com) by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GArpI-0003X8-KP for users@tomcat.apache.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:26:40 -0700 Message-ID: <5730282.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 10:26:40 -0700 (PDT) From: fredk2 To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: mod_jk log level and logging issues In-Reply-To: <44DA1031.4070407@kippdata.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-Sender: fredk2@gmail.com X-Nabble-From: fredk2 References: <5714385.post@talk.nabble.com> <44DA1031.4070407@kippdata.de> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Rainer: Many thanks for your answers (and fast!). "Why do you expect a 404 in case Tomcat is down? If the request matches mod_jk JkMount config, it should try to send to tomcat and the result would be some 50X? " What I meant to say was that when previously you might have had a missing jsp/html and thus a 404, when tomcat is down it says 200 which means, according to the mod_jk.log, that it is working when in reality it is not :-) . Yes, I would expect 50x. thanks, Fred -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-log-level-and-logging-issues-tf2075041.html#a5730282 Sent from the Tomcat - User forum at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org