Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 31334 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2001 13:56:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 31295 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2001 13:56:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO isee.ie) (193.120.67.137) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 19 Apr 2001 13:56:18 -0000 Received: from LIME ([192.168.1.17]) by isee.ie (8.10.2/8.9.3) with SMTP id f3JE7Hk07995 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 15:07:17 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: mail.isee.ie: Host [192.168.1.17] claimed to be LIME Reply-To: From: "Eric Mosley" To: Subject: RE: Tomcat vs JServ Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 14:54:35 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N > I have a jServ box that has run with no problems of any kind for over a > year and a half. To me that says a lot of jServ. Does the latest release > of Tomcat finally support the automatic starting up of Tomcat (not > manual)? What about speed? In some casual tests my jServ system runs > faster than Tomcat. Has anyone done any real benchmarks? Actually this is the essence of what I was enquiring about! I also have an old JServ machine which has been running for two years with zero problems. The crucial issue (for me anyway) is which is faster and less memory intensive for basic servlets (where you would be happy with 2.0 servlet functionality)... Anybody!?