From dev-return-193071-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@tomcat.apache.org Tue Sep 4 21:13:49 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 3998C180629 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 21:13:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 38414 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2018 19:13:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 38404 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2018 19:13:48 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mailrelay2-lw-us.apache.org) (207.244.88.137) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 19:13:48 +0000 Received: from [192.168.23.12] (host81-156-41-190.range81-156.btcentralplus.com [81.156.41.190]) by mailrelay2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 149A32070 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 19:13:46 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Tagging 9.0.x From: Mark Thomas To: dev@tomcat.apache.org Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List References: <560c4079-d06c-97cc-aecf-ed90132ad5a6@apache.org> Message-ID: <8d97a009-b87d-15ce-ac53-9570f27d2c64@apache.org> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 20:13:45 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <560c4079-d06c-97cc-aecf-ed90132ad5a6@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 03/09/18 16:13, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 03/09/18 14:47, Rémy Maucherat wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 12:53 PM Mark Thomas wrote: >> >>> On 03/09/18 11:40, Rémy Maucherat wrote: >>>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 12:19 PM Mark Thomas wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> As the start of September is here I'm planning to tag 9.0.x (and 8.5.x) >>>>> shortly and roll the next monthly release. >>>>> >>>>> I've a couple of things I want to look at first so I'll probably be >>>>> tagging in the next day or two. >>>>> >>>>> What is the view on BZ 62667 (the rewrite issue). Is that a bug or an >>>>> enhancement request? >>>>> >>>> >>>> It's a bug (I didn't know it was supposed to be possible :) ). I don't >>> know >>>> exactly what level of recursion is actually allowed either. I'm working >>> on >>>> it (assuming it's the simplest case) but I'm not sure it's going to be >>> done >>>> tomorrow. >>> >>> Ack. I can hold off the tag for a day or two if that helps. >>> >> >> The fix I had in the works went well. I don't think there are other places >> that need recursion in rewrite. > > Great news. Tx. Just an updated. I'm almost ready to tag but I'm seeing failures with the http2.TestAsyncFlush on both Windows and OSX. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org