tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Konstantin Kolinko <knst.koli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 9.0.10
Date Fri, 22 Jun 2018 08:41:55 GMT
2018-06-22 11:03 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org>:
> On 22/06/18 00:25, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2018-06-20 22:45 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org>:
>>> The proposed Apache Tomcat 9.0.10 release is now available for voting.
>>>
>>
>> I have not tested this version yet (running 8.5 tests now), but I note
>> that the following *.asc files are missing,
>> both in Tomcat 9 and Tomcat 8.5:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-9/v9.0.10/bin/
>> apache-tomcat-9.0.10.tar.gz.asc
>> apache-tomcat-9.0.10.zip.asc
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.32/bin/
>> apache-tomcat-8.5.32.tar.gz.asc
>> apache-tomcat-8.5.32.zip.asc
>
> Thanks. Fixed.
>
> I still don't understand why this is happening. I'll try and pay more
> attention next time.

Me neither.

Do you have stdout/stderr output from creating a release?

At buildbot I see no issues
E.g.:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/3385/steps/compile/logs/stdio/text

Lines 8-12: the place where gpg passphrase is asked
[[[
gpg-init-1:

gpg-init-2:

release-init:
]]]

Lines 735-751: *.zip, *windows*.zip and *.tar.gz are created.
[[[
package-zip:
      [zip] Building zip:
/home/buildslave/slave/tomcat-trunk/build/output/release/v9.0.11-dev/bin/apache-tomcat-9.0.11-dev.zip

sign:

package-winzip:
      [zip] Building zip:
/home/buildslave/slave/tomcat-trunk/build/output/release/v9.0.11-dev/bin/apache-tomcat-9.0.11-dev-windows-x86.zip

sign:
      [zip] Building zip:
/home/buildslave/slave/tomcat-trunk/build/output/release/v9.0.11-dev/bin/apache-tomcat-9.0.11-dev-windows-x64.zip

sign:

package-tgz:
      [tar] Building tar:
/home/buildslave/slave/tomcat-trunk/build/output/release/v9.0.11-dev/bin/apache-tomcat-9.0.11-dev.tar.gz

sign:
]]]

The *windows*.zip files are created and signed in between of *.zip and
*.tar.gz ones,  and the code in build.xml is essentially the same for
*.zip and *windows*zip.

It is odd that only *.zip.asc, *.tar.gz.asc are lost, while
*windows*.zip.asc files are OK.  Maybe they are lost at some later
time?

Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Mime
View raw message