Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CF5200BBD for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:49:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 96665160B00; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:49:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id D81F9160AEB for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:49:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 31040 invoked by uid 500); 24 Oct 2016 22:49:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 31030 invoked by uid 99); 24 Oct 2016 22:49:30 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:49:30 +0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 66BAE1A0015 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id c78so129770037wme.0 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:49:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvebjJERKu4JcKlVIS+7K+7kYf7uFjD6S7a1mVxLWfn/q++ojogH+i0rLIOt/1Qt7PMfxu9P7IT0Ylsprg== X-Received: by 10.28.73.214 with SMTP id w205mr83517wma.86.1477349367784; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:49:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.80.148.206 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:49:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9my_Maucherat?= Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:49:27 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Introduce methods read/write with ByteBuffer in CoyoteInputStream/CoyoteOutputStream To: Tomcat Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114b30f846b015053fa434ee archived-at: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:49:37 -0000 --001a114b30f846b015053fa434ee Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2016-10-24 20:18 GMT+02:00 Violeta Georgieva : > There are no issues reported for the refactored functionality available i= n > 9.0.0.M11. > I think it is safe to back port the changes for the next 8.5 release. > Do you see any issues? > > Ok, so it probably works. I suppose it's up to me, at some point, to try to improve whatever I would like to improve (for example, it lost API symmetry - normally, read/write APIs are the same, not the case here -, and it's not very GC friendly). R=C3=A9my --001a114b30f846b015053fa434ee--