tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
Subject Re: Bug that spans tomcat and tomcat-native
Date Fri, 24 Jun 2016 20:52:10 GMT
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Mark Thomas <> wrote:
> On 24/06/2016 20:01, wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Mark Thomas <> wrote:
>>> On 24/06/2016 18:41, Nate Clark wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Nate Clark <> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Mark Thomas <>
>>>>>> On 24/06/2016 18:25, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>>>>> Can you provide the settings you are using for the Executor as
well please?
>>>>>     <Executor name="defaultThreadPool" namePrefix="catalina-exec-"
>>>>>         maxThreads="500" minSpareThreads="4"/>
>>>>>> And how long do the initial 5,000,000 4k requests take to process?
>>>>> 40 minutes.
>>>> Not sure this matters but I just double checked and there are actually
>>>> 400 threads in total doing the 4k PUTs. Two clients each doing 200
>>>> threads. the 100MB test is 24 threads total 12 per client machine.
>>>> Sorry for misinformation earlier.
>>> No problem. Thanks for the information. One last question (for now). How
>>> many processors / cores / threads does the server support? I'm trying to
>>> get a handle on what the concurrency looks like.
>> The machine has two physical chips each with 6 cores and
>> hyper-threading enabled, so 24 cores exposed to the OS.
> Thanks.
> <snip/>
>> If it matters the system also has 256GB of memory.
> I don't think RAM is playing a role here but it is still good to know.
> In terms of next steps, I want to see if I can come up with a theory
> that matches what you are observing. From that we can then assess
> whether the proposed patch can be improved.
> Apologies for the drip-feeding of questions. As I learn a bit more, a
> few more questions come to mind.
> I'm wondering if this is a problem that builds up over time. If I
> understood your previous posts correctly, running the big tests
> immediately gave ~700MB/s whereas running the small tests then the big
> tests resulting in ~350MB/s during the big tests. Are you able to
> experiment with this a little bit? For example, if you do big tests, 1M
> (~20%) small tests, big tests, 1M small tests, big tests etc. What is
> the data rate for the big tests after 0, 1M, 2M, 3M, 4M and 5M little tests.

Sure I can try that. For the in between tests do you want me to run
those for a set amount of time or number of files? Like each smaller
batch like 20min and then 10min of large and then next smaller size?

> What I am trying to pin down is how quickly does this problem build up.
> Also, do you see any failed requests or do they all succeed?

All successes.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message