tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rainer Jung <>
Subject Re: Bug that spans tomcat and tomcat-native
Date Mon, 27 Jun 2016 18:13:11 GMT
Am 27.06.2016 um 18:47 schrieb Nate Clark:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:17 PM,  <> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:04 PM,  <> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Rainer Jung <>
>>>> Great analysis. I was really wondering, what could make the hash map so huge
>>>> and hadn't thought about the hash function as the problem.
>>>> Before OpenSSL 1.1.0 there's a callback for applications to provide their
>>>> own thread IDs:
>>>> So we could probably work around the problem of the poor hashing function
>>>> passing in IDs that work for hashing (pre-hashed ID?). Of course then we
>>>> loose the direct association of the OpenSSL thread ID with the real platform
>>>> thread id.
>>>> Currently our callback in tcnative is ssl_set_thread_id() which refers to
>>>> ssl_thread_id(), which on Linux gets the ID from the APR function
>>>> apr_os_thread_current(). So we could add some hashing formula in
>>>> ssl_thread_id().
>>> I think just using the real thread id would work, since now it isn't
>>> using the real thread id instead it is using the address location of
>>> errno. If this was the real thread id I think the hash algorithm and
>>> bucket selection they have now will work much better since the thread
>>> ids are basically numerically increasing and aren't aligned to powers
>>> of 2.
>> Sorry, I need to read code a bit closer. I misread the
>> OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 0x10100000L as version < 1.0.1 and not 1.1.0.
>> I would still expect real thread ids to provide enough of a
>> distribution in a map where the hash bucket ends up being is ((ID *
>> 13) & 0X7F).
> OK, this now makes more sense apr_os_thread_current() calls
> pthread_self() which returns a pthred_t which is basically a handle
> for pthread's internal state and not an actual ID. It might be better
> to use gettid(), but that isn't as portable.

I wouldn't care too much about portability right now. If you can prove 
Mark's analysis by using gettid() on Linux and checking that this fixes 
the performance issue, that would very useful feedback. If it doesn't 
help, we can go down the path of using the hash statistics to get more 
info about what's happening. If it helps, we can think further about how 
to reduce hash collisions fo every platform.



To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message