Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Message-ID: <50F5D67B.3090505@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 22:21:47 +0000
From: Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; WOW64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tomcat Developers List <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: APR, WebSocket and Servlet 3.1 NIO refactoring
References: <50F559B9.3010901@apache.org>
  <1358266537.12507.7.camel@mail.remm.hd.free.fr>
  <50F5AD5F.8080703@apache.org>
 <1358285214.12507.13.camel@mail.remm.hd.free.fr>
In-Reply-To: <1358285214.12507.13.camel@mail.remm.hd.free.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 15/01/2013 21:26, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 19:26 +0000, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> I had to solve each of these issues in the web container of JBoss.
>>> Although this is not going to be quite 100% compatible with Tomcat, it
>>> is very similar.
>>>
>>> I recommend looking at the branch that is in AS 7 trunk:
>>> http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossweb/branches/7.2.x/
>>
>> Thanks. The more I look into this the more strangeness I find. I'll keep
>> the above in mind if I need some pointers.
> 
> Ok. With APR, dealing with the poller is not very forgiving, so I think
> you should use that, it is well tested too (plus the license is ASL
> now).

The non-forgiving nature of APR is why I prefer to make small changes
from the current Tomcat version rather than the huge change to the JBoss
one. It appears that they have diverged quite a lot.

As I said, I'll certainly use it as a guide for specific features if I
need some pointers.

Mark


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org