Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72060 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2010 11:12:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Oct 2010 11:12:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 55769 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2010 11:12:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 55616 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2010 11:12:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 55606 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2010 11:12:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 11:12:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 11:12:46 +0000 Received: (qmail 72038 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2010 11:12:26 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.23.9]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username markt, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 11:12:26 +0000 Message-ID: <4CA7138F.7040208@apache.org> Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 12:12:15 +0100 From: Mark Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Jasper & Servlet 3.0 References: <4CA6EF6E.8050701@pidster.com> In-Reply-To: <4CA6EF6E.8050701@pidster.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/10/2010 09:38, Pid wrote: > Hi, > > Idea: instead of outputting XML as well, for Servlet 3.0 webapps, Jasper > could just annotate the generated classes. > > Thoughts? Are you talking about pre-compilation? Generally, -0 since I loath using annotations for configuration. When fault finding, if the web.xml doesn't show the complete picture you have to search though the entire source code (if you have access to it) to figure out what is going on. I have only been bitten by this once so far - and in a simple case - but it was a PITA and took me a little while to figure out what on earth was going on. Yes Tomcat can providing logging to help, but I still prefer just to use web.xml. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org