Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 75210 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2010 15:57:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Sep 2010 15:57:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 17246 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2010 15:57:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 17097 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2010 15:57:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 17088 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2010 15:57:20 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:57:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jason.brittain@mulesource.com designates 209.85.214.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.173] (HELO mail-iw0-f173.google.com) (209.85.214.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:56:58 +0000 Received: by iwn38 with SMTP id 38so2191662iwn.18 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:56:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.193.11 with SMTP id ds11mr969906ibb.192.1283529396953; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:56:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.207.72 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 08:56:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C80F657.1080008@apache.org> References: <4C58B873.2080504@apache.org> <4C80F657.1080008@apache.org> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 08:56:36 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.2 From: Jason Brittain To: Tomcat Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d36948c3a359048f5cf91c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d36948c3a359048f5cf91c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks Mark! It's probably from a very long time ago, in which case there could be years worth of code that depends on these slashes being there. -- Jason On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 05/08/2010 22:09, Jason Brittain wrote: > > One thing I noticed while testing 7.0.2 is that the WebModule MBean > > ObjectNames differ slightly from those of Tomcat 6. Example: > > > > Tomcat 7.0.2, ObjectName for the context "/": > > > Catalina:j2eeType=WebModule,name=localhost/,J2EEApplication=none,J2EEServer=none > > > > Tomcat 6.0.x, ObjectName for the context "/": > > > Catalina:j2eeType=WebModule,name=//localhost/,J2EEApplication=none,J2EEServer=none > > I don't see any reason for the // in the Tomcat 6 name either but I have > added them back for Tomcat 7 to keep things consistent. > > Mark > --0016e6d36948c3a359048f5cf91c--