Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of costin@gmail.com designates
 209.85.222.177 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=md5MgKhaMAoKYqhKAVuviYoU3lDrsL146Cow2GDMTlK+IA+xwY32dv0ubsOkjmwBjM
         99w48mgbRGXDGvrhL/ImTqThJFIWlAA4Mz7+DNGCfWi1CkNQCanV9BZt371wnP6FzozV
         vI90psXYSrIqpJT+9HpZdhTWNweRIWX4XVGMk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4B444639.9010505@apache.org>
References: <96e4b5231001051627i440e0195w701496fdcd537d77@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4B444639.9010505@apache.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 08:50:12 -0800
Message-ID: <96e4b5231001070850j41848f7eya466091cfcc9a53c@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Tomcat-Lite update
From: Costin Manolache <costin@gmail.com>
To: Tomcat Developers List <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502c1c556488f047c95dd86

--00504502c1c556488f047c95dd86
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org> wrote:

> On 06/01/2010 00:27, Costin Manolache wrote:
> > Also, I would like to know if other comitters are OK with (temporarily -
> > i.e. until the 7.0 release vote) including lite in the tomcat7 builds,
> > so people can try it out.
>
> How about adding it to the extras build? It could be included in the
> release then as well.
>
>
Sounds good, thanks for the suggestions.  On the building part - tomcat-lite
supports both
maven and ant, and the ant build is using ivy to download the deps - I will
 keep it
this way instead of using the tomcat's download tasks, seems easier. So I
will just call
 lite's build.xml from tomcat extras. Downloading ivy and ivy downloading
deps is automated.

Any comments on including the experimental SPDY support (
http://www.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-protocol ) ?
I know we had countless debates on JK2 and http proxies, but some extra code
to try out doesn't hurt :-)

Costin

--00504502c1c556488f047c95dd86--