Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 94091 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2009 20:27:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Dec 2009 20:27:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 74362 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2009 20:27:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 74297 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2009 20:27:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 74286 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2009 20:27:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:27:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.252.22.128] (HELO smtp5.freeserve.com) (193.252.22.128) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:27:39 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3418.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id AE2421C000D4 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:27:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3418.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9BD271C000D7 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:27:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from mx01.dev.local (unknown [91.109.141.178]) by mwinf3418.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 57A391C000D4 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:27:18 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20091222202718359.57A391C000D4@mwinf3418.me.freeserve.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx01.dev.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E018325CE for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:27:55 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at homeinbox.net Received: from mx01.dev.local ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx01.dev.local [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27ny4vaptvTJ for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:27:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.0.9] (study03.dev.local [192.168.0.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.dev.local (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 99997325C9 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:27:51 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4B312B9F.7010107@apache.org> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:27:11 +0000 From: Mark Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21 (try 2) References: <4B30EFB5.8020507@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4B30EFB5.8020507@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 22/12/2009 16:11, jean-frederic clere wrote: > The candidates binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.21-try2/ > > According to the release process, the 6.0.21 tag is: > [X] Broken > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] Stable > > The differences are only the tcnative windows binary files: tcnative was > broken in the previous try. Source files: src.tar.gz == src.zip MD5s match Signatures good Key in ASF web of trust All the source files have linux line-endings. I think this is a side-effect of building on linux rather than Windows and has been this way for the last few releases. There is a patch proposed to fix this but I don't view this as a show stopper. There is also a difference between the tag and the source files. The diff is: --- D:/repos/asf/public/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_21/build.properties.default Tue Dec 22 17:10:53 2009 +++ D:/tmp/apache-tomcat-6.0.21-src-zip/apache-tomcat-6.0.21-src/build.properties.default Tue Dec 22 17:31:18 2009 @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ compile.debug=true base-commons.loc=http://archive.apache.org/dist/commons -base-tomcat.loc=http://archive.apache.org/dist/tomcat +base-tomcat.loc=http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/ base-sf.loc=http://downloads.sourceforge.net # ----- Commons Logging, version 1.1 or later ----- I assume this was done to include the desired windows binaries. However, this means that anyone trying to build from the src distro will be pulling the Windows binaries from the wrong place. The correct way to do this would have been to create a build.properties file and override the base-tomcat.loc setting in that file. The tag is correct, the source bundles just need re-building from the tag. Binaries: apache-tomcat-6.0.21.zip.md5 is broken. If lists multiple files but the MD5 is only correct for the first file in the list. The root cause is a copy and paster error in the build file (patch already proposed to fix it). Applying this fix would mean a re-tag. However, I'd be happy with manually fixing the generated MD5s to fix this to save the re-tag. Servlet TCK passes JSP TCK passes - 1 failure This one, however, can't be ignored. Remy hinted at it early today. The fix for bug 47453 created a regression in that the constraint expressed in JSP.2.3.4 namely that A String literal can be provided, as long as the return type of the deferred method signature is not void is not enforced. This needs to be fixed for 6.0.21 and will, therefore, require a re-tag. I am starting to look at this now. Since we are going to have to re-tag anyway, it would be good if the patches required to fix the various niggles above were applied before the tag. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org