Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46290 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2008 16:57:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2008 16:57:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 90950 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2008 16:57:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 90895 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2008 16:57:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 90884 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2008 16:57:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:57:44 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [195.227.30.246] (HELO datura.kippdata.de) (195.227.30.246) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:57:15 +0000 Received: from [195.227.30.148] (larix [195.227.30.148]) by datura.kippdata.de (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id m15GvHKC028463 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:57:19 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47A8956D.9000205@kippdata.de> Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:57:17 +0100 From: Rainer Jung User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070802) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16 References: <1201702866.9846.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <47A79D15.6010502@kippdata.de> <47A8331B.3020005@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <47A8331B.3020005@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Remy Maucherat wrote: > Rainer Jung wrote: >> Remy Maucherat schrieb: >>> The candidates binaries are available here: >>> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/ >>> >>> According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is: >>> [ ] Broken >>> [ ] Alpha >>> [ ] Beta >>> [X] Stable >>> >>> Rémy >> >> One small note: there is a new Thumbs.db file in >> server/webapps/host-manager/images which doesn't come from svn and >> wasn't there in 6.0.14. I guess it was auto-generated by some of those >> smart service on the build system and we don't really want it in >> future releases. > > That's caused by me building on Windows [XP] for the Windows installer. > I can redo the binaries before putting them in the wild, but obviously > it shouldn't be a huge issue. > > Rémy I would agree with keeping the files we used for testing. No need for repackaging, because the issue is so small and there's always a little risk in repackaging. So I would suggest to simply proceed with the files we tested (and maybe have a short look at the contents of the Thumbs.db, so we know we don't deliver something compromising ... :) ) Regards, Rainer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org