Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3547 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2008 13:09:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Feb 2008 13:09:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 50983 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2008 13:09:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 50935 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2008 13:09:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 50924 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2008 13:09:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 50921 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2008 13:09:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 05:09:20 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 13:09:13 +0000 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 786F871406F; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 05:08:59 -0800 (PST) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44349] - mod_jk/1.2.26 module does not read worker.status.sticky_session_force property correctly In-Reply-To: X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Message-Id: <20080204130902.786F871406F@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 05:08:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44349 ------- Additional Comments From amz_sid@trashmail.net 2008-02-04 05:08 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > I tested Apache/2.0.52 with mod_jk/1.2.22 and it picked up the property setting > > correctly. > > Please ignore this last comment as I had checked the behaviour only and not the > JK Status console with mod_jk/1.2.22. It still behaves incorrectly in that it > has sticky_session_force=True but when one of the servers is down with a session > already established it loadbalances to the other server causing errors in our > application because we do not have the original session. Please note that we do > not require session replication switched on. I have just checked the JK Status Console for mod_jk/1.2.22 and low and behold it does not show the sticky_session_force property as True even though it has been configured. Has this ever worked? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org