Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 68173 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2007 18:37:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Oct 2007 18:37:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 68045 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2007 18:37:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 67874 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2007 18:37:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 67863 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2007 18:37:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:37:41 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of paul.shemansky@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.190] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:37:45 +0000 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so453282nfb for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:37:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=LKyKn4b3zE+2ped1FkN6SYAYlPqydZHc2kMzFFJT8bY=; b=cZkLb2BExnKWMQm0BV2n7ygkmgQQGmTcLwPtocDfN17jph1RFmRBpcEQhN/8CXdj1pLtLbi4kJJJZHjEGHDK/tJqhzPZScxJyBTBqPDKgEs3F6sLweg2a6oBGwLQ6fcXdpM30wMWfDfgIx2CVN0sgkg79IRnfzypgGQa3bstTes= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NXbzkXYNtjEM2aJR8vSp3mllbFfvxLY40k70mgMSg77LaHfjGe5K9MAp2ucCbHbIaCZuXL9SdgXK7jPv5LGW+KfTlzMghjx87lu+L7AGlCLrtax/v8Uh2bEMf5UbFf0EPU3Nlj3E7d9XkM1knu3IWF7espaCqjbkiUnn1WRN5hE= Received: by 10.86.90.2 with SMTP id n2mr1563333fgb.1192819043678; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:37:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.62.16 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:37:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <73fce4c20710191137k50f4fe48r56adff551a5f4624@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:37:23 -0400 From: "Paul Shemansky" To: "Tomcat Developers List" Subject: Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <73fce4c20710171321v474dee41i69b477cc47dcef95@mail.gmail.com> <47168882.8050602@hanik.com> <96e4b5230710171526w3877d292l8964c41677ca393f@mail.gmail.com> <47178030.8000604@sourcelabs.com> <73fce4c20710190910x7dc66bc0xbd9f73de34476f77@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Yoav, > On 10/19/07, Yoav Shapira wrote: > > On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky wrote: > > I'm going to keep waiting for more a few more +1s in the > > "as-an-alternate" category before doing any real work on it. > Speaking only for myself, I don't see how waiting helps anything. I'm > +0 to you (or anyone else) doing the work and showing us a working > Maven build. I'm -0 to committing to a build system idea before I see > its implementation. It's just like most other issues or enhancement > requests: I'm always open to new ideas but I want to see the proof in > the pudding, so to speak. If I commit to working on it, and try to show some sort of proof-in-the-pudding, the issue returns to the problem I mentioned before which is hosting it. I had originally mentioned the idea of opening a branch for it. However, I don't have commit access to the ASF repository, yet, and I felt too new to be asking for it. Since I have made everyone aware that I would do the work, and the overwhelming consensus seems to be "integrate-instead-of-migrate", I'm ready to start prototyping in my spare time. Would you grant me access to commit the finished prototype if turns out to be good pudding? > And that's coming from someone who used Maven for his day job the past > couple of years, so is not a Maven opponent. Since you use it regularly, how do you personally feel about it? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org