Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <44AF807A.2000809@rowe-clan.net>
Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2006 04:52:58 -0500
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060614)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tomcat Developers List <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: mod_jk 1.2.16 test results
References: <44A9484A.2060106@apache.org> <44AF685F.7070003@rowe-clan.net>
 <44AF7141.1090104@kippdata.de>
In-Reply-To: <44AF7141.1090104@kippdata.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Rainer Jung wrote:
> 
> For the next feature release I will prepare the use of release
> candidates, because I think then the naming will look more familiar to
> users.

You mean 1.2.16 three times over?  Please don't...

Version numbers are cheap :)

Once the tag and roll is there, it's far less confusing when someone
says they are running 1.2.16 that you know for a fact it's the 1.2.16
that was [not] released.  As opposed to fishing for which RC that they
had installed.

Thanks for pointing out the specific regression!

Bill

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org