Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 395 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2006 12:27:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2006 12:27:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 98568 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2006 12:27:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 98526 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2006 12:27:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 98515 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2006 12:27:37 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 04:27:37 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [66.49.136.231] (HELO host12.host12-server.com) (66.49.136.231) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 04:27:36 -0800 Received: from www.hanik.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host12.host12-server.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k19CREEl023826 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2006 07:27:14 -0500 Received: from 71.252.253.242 (SquirrelMail authenticated user devlists@hanik.com) by www.hanik.com with HTTP; Thu, 9 Feb 2006 07:27:14 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <63684.71.252.253.242.1139488034.squirrel@www.hanik.com> In-Reply-To: References: <43EA8161.9070000@hanik.com> Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 07:27:14 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Cluster - questions From: devlists@hanik.com To: "Tomcat Developers List" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > It implements aTCP/IP Socket receiver without NIO. This classes very > useful for async mode at some linux platforms. Please, don't remove > them, they are very important for some user. ok, no problem. I will leave them in. > > I think also we must discuss the next steps to change the cluster code. > > Regards > Peter > > > Am 09.02.2006 um 00:40 schrieb Filip Hanik - Dev Lists: > >> What are the SocketReplicationListener and the >> SocketReplicationThread classes? >> >> seems like we are duplicating functionality. I'm planning on >> breaking out the membership and replication logic into a component >> so that we don't mix group messaging logic with session replication >> logic as they are two different classes. >> >> Looks like these classes are only referenced from the >> SimpleTcpCluster and it looks like they are an attempt to do what >> we already do. >> >> Question: Do we need them? Can I remove them? >> >> Filip >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org