Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
From: bugzilla@apache.org
To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34107]  - session already invalidated before
 valueUnbound() called
In-Reply-To: <bug-34107-78@http.issues.apache.org/bugzilla/>
Message-Id: <20060202170821.9452CCB@ajax.apache.org>
Date: Thu,  2 Feb 2006 18:08:21 +0100 (CET)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34107>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34107


apernoud@sopragroup.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |critical


------- Additional Comments From apernoud@sopragroup.com  2006-02-02 18:08 -------
Another question : what's the use of the valueUnbound that gives us an
HttpSessionBindingEvent if we can't make any call at it whithout getting this
exception ?
The "event" most important stuff is the HttpSession (I would even say it's the
only stuff, and we can't work at all with it whithout getting the
IllegalStateException.

And reading the spec, I agree that any call made "by a request" after the
session was invalidated must throw the Exception, but not the ones made in the
valueUnbound. If you don't agree I'd like to be explained the interest of the
SessionListener.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org