Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 92529 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2006 14:27:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Feb 2006 14:27:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 22545 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2006 14:26:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 22505 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2006 14:26:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 22493 invoked by uid 99); 8 Feb 2006 14:26:45 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Feb 2006 06:26:45 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of andre.kammerl@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.192 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.192] (HELO uproxy.gmail.com) (66.249.92.192) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Feb 2006 06:26:44 -0800 Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h2so4487ugf for ; Wed, 08 Feb 2006 06:26:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:to:references:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole:from; b=cW8o8ZvrGcWjwgzuJgsgaJ43oBa7jBu9FRUK/Fyp99y0KDzGuEZMgHx7ybB4F6rjjSTufWS7jWvIgtZXVL0O/oGlmrOdvvGt96hQ6T0MXVrDbumLyCMnkqCqgscXxG9FmGXkJQOLAKyd7hydSLqmGQDs4weBlaUKE+EzrCOrnoQ= Received: by 10.48.255.14 with SMTP id c14mr2002459nfi; Wed, 08 Feb 2006 06:26:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from Teletran1 ( [84.145.205.218]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id k23sm2186103nfc.2006.02.08.06.26.22; Wed, 08 Feb 2006 06:26:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <000a01c62cbb$9aa5ee30$0c00a8c0@Teletran1> To: "Tomcat Developers List" References: <5CFAE2F0BB15E848882F88C79BC764C86635B8@ms-afit-05.afit.edu> <43DFBAA5.9050209@jadn.com> <43DFCAED.1020607@jadn.com> <43DFCDB5.1030605@apache.org> <43E38F11.6020206@jadn.com> <43E39494.6070708@apache.org> <43E3AFC0.1060302@jadn.com> <43E3B75E.3040803@apache.org> <43E40932.30003@jadn.com> <001301c62cb2$eded98d0$0c00a8c0@Teletran1> <18586.68.166.208.98.1139406265.squirrel@jadn.com> Subject: Re: Building Tomcat Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 15:26:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 From: Andre Kammerl X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N The mx4j was the first problem I encountered. The server was broken and the search with google didn't show any result. But when I was looking for another project for my case study, I found mx4j 1.1.1 on another server. I can send you the zip-file if you're interessted. There are four other packages that are not available when ant is trying to download them. I only remember three of the four names, cause I've downloaded them. The fourth one is included in the download of Tomcat 5.5.15, so I only had to copy it. The other three are: saxpath-1.0 jaxen-1.0-FCS jakarta-struts-1.2.4 Hope this will help you with you patch. Regards Andr� ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Herrmann" To: "Tomcat Developers List" Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 2:44 PM Subject: Re: Building Tomcat > > Thanks! I felt I had it a time or two, but the build script that I use > (I'm trying to build a pristine copy) downloads stuff from sourceforge and > kept getting into trouble downloading the mx4j bits. Seems like they > dropped the mx4j 2.1.0 and you can only get mx4j 2.1.1 - making a truly > pristine (ie. md5sum verifyable) version of 5.0 might be very challenging > in the future if enough bits rot on the vine. > > I'm still tinkering with it, should have it working in a few days. I'm > planning on posting my patches so they can be used to update the building > tomcat 5.0 page. > > Cheers > -bob > > >> Hi! >> >> Are you still interessted in version 5.0? I've collected all the missing >> files manually. There is only a problem when ant is trying to build it. >> Perhaps you can solve it. >> >> build-catalina-core: >> [javac] Compiling 326 source files to O:\Diplomarbeit\Tomcat >> 5.0.30\jakarta- >> tomcat-5.0.30-src\jakarta-tomcat-5\build\classes >> [javac] O:\Diplomarbeit\Tomcat >> 5.0.30\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.30-src\jakarta-tomc >> at-catalina\catalina\src\share\org\apache\catalina\Container.java:23: >> cannot >> acc >> ess javax.servlet.ServletException >> [javac] bad class file: O:\Diplomarbeit\Tomcat >> 5.0.30\java\servlet-api-2.4\l >> ib\servlet-api.jar(javax/servlet/ServletException.class) >> [javac] class file has wrong version 49.0, should be 48.0 >> [javac] Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct >> subdirectory of >> the classpath. >> [javac] import javax.servlet.ServletException; >> [javac] ^ >> [javac] 1 error >> >> BUILD FAILED >> O:\Diplomarbeit\Tomcat 5.0.30\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.30-src\build.xml:50: The >> follow >> ing error occurred while executing this line: >> O:\Diplomarbeit\Tomcat >> 5.0.30\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.30-src\jakarta-tomcat-5\build.x >> ml:447: The following error occurred while executing this line: >> O:\Diplomarbeit\Tomcat >> 5.0.30\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.30-src\jakarta-tomcat-5\build.x >> ml:411: The following error occurred while executing this line: >> O:\Diplomarbeit\Tomcat >> 5.0.30\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.30-src\jakarta-tomcat-catalina\ >> catalina\build.xml:594: Compile failed; see the compiler error output for >> detail >> s. >> >> >> Andr� >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Bob Herrmann" >> To: "Tomcat Developers List" >> Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 2:53 AM >> Subject: Re: Building Tomcat >> >> >>> >>> Humm. Since the instructions on the page are broken (cvs and not >>> subversion, the build.properties.defaults include sites and urls that >>> are >>> out of date), perhaps the page should be removed. Or a disclaimer >>> should >>> be added to the page saying that the 5.0 series is not actively >>> maintained >>> and that developers should persue the 5.5 line. >>> >>> -bob >>> >>> Mark Thomas wrote: >>> >>>>Bob Herrmann wrote: >>>> >>>>>Ok, Is 5.0 a valid build target, or is its usage discouraged? >>>>> >>>>>I was following the build instructions for building tomcat 5.0 >>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.0-doc/building.html >>>>>the build.xml that it provides use CVS tags to extract the 5.0 bits. >>>>> >>>>>-bob >>>>> >>>> >>>>You can build 5.0 if you need to. You'll just need to modify the >>>>build.xml a bit. If you have the choice, go for 5.5. Very little has >>>>happened on 5.0 for a while - the focus is on 5.5 and starting 6.0 >>>> >>>>Mark >>>> >>>> >>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org >>>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org