Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 79387 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2006 13:24:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2006 13:24:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 21343 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2006 13:24:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 21129 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2006 13:24:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 21118 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2006 13:24:14 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 05:24:14 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [212.27.42.36] (HELO smtp6-g19.free.fr) (212.27.42.36) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 05:24:14 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.1] (gou06-1-82-224-99-120.fbx.proxad.net [82.224.99.120]) by smtp6-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D453181E0 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 14:23:53 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43BD1DEA.1020508@apache.org> Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 14:23:54 +0100 From: Remy Maucherat User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: EL and JSP 2.1 References: <43B08F14.9050500@hookom.net> <43B1CCC5.7000907@apache.org> <43B1CFAB.8070808@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <43B1CFAB.8070808@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Mark Thomas wrote: >>The key questions are: >> - does 6.0.x become the main development branch? > > Yes. We did this for 5.5.x and it worked. Ok. >> - do we merge jasper and container? > > No. Good to keep them independent. Ok. >> - do we merge build and container > > Maybe. If someone wants to take the time to do this and update the > build scripts great. Personally, not an itch I feel the need to scratch. The JSP implementation is independent, so there's no change here. >> - do we maintain servletapi for 6.0? > > No for the api stuff proper. We don't host it, can't change it and our > own implementation would be more trouble than it is worth. > > Maybe for the examples. It is useful to be able to fix problems with > them. The examples could always be merged in with the container module. I think we should have an implementation of the new API. R�my --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org