Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3627 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2004 19:00:51 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jan 2004 19:00:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 63396 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2004 19:00:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 63350 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2004 19:00:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 63337 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2004 19:00:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jan 2004 19:00:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 11524 invoked by uid 65534); 21 Jan 2004 19:00:38 -0000 Received: from p509255C9.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO wstst06) (80.146.85.201) by mail.gmx.net (mp012) with SMTP; 21 Jan 2004 20:00:38 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1766531 Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 20:00:30 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnter_Knauf?= Reply-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnter_Knauf?= To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: [PATHCH] ./jk/native2/server/apache2/jk_service_apache2.c Message-ID: References: <20040121100746.E6415@kylev.com> X-Mailer: AK-Mail 3.5 [ger] (registered, single user license) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > IMHO, this is wrong. The server port isn't necessarily the port being > listened on. See bug report and patch, long ignored: > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D16901 ok, but its as wrong as before - my patch doesnt change the behaviour from= what I see, and this is what I can find in the httpd-2.1 sources too in o= rder to work with APR 1.0 because apr_sockaddr_port_get() was removed. I dont know for what reasons the patch you point to isnt applied yet; and = I agree with you that it is better to correct the behaviour than change fr= om wrong to wrong; so I'd suggest that you create another patch and post i= t here, and hope that it will be accepted by those who have commit rights,= just as I do... Guenter. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org