Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 11483 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2003 07:22:52 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Oct 2003 07:22:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 95617 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2003 07:22:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 95477 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2003 07:22:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 95464 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2003 07:22:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orngca-mls01.socal.rr.com) (66.75.160.16) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Oct 2003 07:22:22 -0000 Received: from summit.home.greenhydrant.com (66-75-241-88.san.rr.com [66.75.241.88]) by orngca-mls01.socal.rr.com (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h9N7Ibd21159 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 00:18:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from greenhydrant.com (dave.home.greenhydrant.com [10.0.0.10]) by summit.home.greenhydrant.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4E9823B3 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 00:22:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3F9781BA.5080506@greenhydrant.com> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 00:22:34 -0700 From: David Rees User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: New builds ? References: <001501c396f9$a890a260$0302000a@GISDATA.ZG> <3F940E73.1050107@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3F940E73.1050107@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Remy Maucherat wrote: > So, what do we do with 4.1.28 ? AFAIK, no significant issue has been > found with this build, with minor tweaks being made since then in the > connectors. > Is a 4.1.29 needed, or is it simply people forgot about that build ? > > Comments ? I've been using 4.1.29 for development without any issues for a few days now. Just one minor annoyance, I get this message twice when starting Tomcat up: "CoyoteConnector Coyote can't register jmx for protocol" Now that new versions of commons dbcp and pool have been released, upgrading to the latest may be a good idea and an excuse to retag 4.1.30. I don't think you'll get many testers until it's called beta, though. Other than that, looks good! -Dave --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org