Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 1902 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2003 13:19:44 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2003 13:19:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 27724 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2003 13:19:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 27696 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2003 13:19:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 27683 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2003 13:19:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (209.237.227.194) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2003 13:19:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 1025 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2003 13:19:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO apache.org) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Oct 2003 13:19:35 -0000 Message-ID: <3F7AD4C2.3010106@apache.org> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 15:21:06 +0200 From: Henri Gomez User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; fr-FR; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/conf server.xml References: <20031001094340.78196.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> <3F7AA8A9.6020707@apache.org> <3F7AA943.5090702@apache.org> <3F7AABE9.60000@apache.org> <3F7AACF3.40301@apache.org> <3F7ABB67.8060100@apache.org> <3F7AD077.1000907@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3F7AD077.1000907@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Rating: localhost 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Remy Maucherat a �crit : > Remy Maucherat wrote: > >> Henri Gomez wrote: >> I'll try to build it, and see if it works. I'll also diff the adapter >> between the two branches, to see if there aren't any forgotten patches. >> >> If it works well, we can try to include that with 4.1.28. > > > It doesn't look good: j-t-c now depends on JMX and modeler 1.1. That's a > lot of stuff to update :-( May be just have to update build.xml to included mx4j and modeler. > Plus there are tricky changes which I don't know if I should port or > not. So that probably means regressions. > So if it's up to me, I'll choose to wait for TC 5 :) Many site will stay with there TC 4.1.x (or 3.3.x) for some times so if we have 2 branches for jtc, we may miss fix/patch from one branch to another. Upgrading the build file seems to be easier ... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org