Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 76553 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2002 00:08:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Dec 2002 00:08:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 1095 invoked by uid 97); 10 Dec 2002 00:09:26 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 963 invoked by uid 97); 10 Dec 2002 00:09:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 901 invoked by uid 98); 10 Dec 2002 00:09:24 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Path: not-for-mail From: Costin Manolache Subject: Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 ) Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 15:58:51 -0800 Lines: 38 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.84.39.162 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1039478884 28354 64.84.39.162 (10 Dec 2002 00:08:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 00:08:04 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: KNode/0.7.1 Sender: news X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Pier Fumagalli wrote: >>> I remember that when I proposed the same thing (roughly) and wanted to >>> call it "Tomcat-HA" or something like it, you said: >>> >>> "If possible, please also change the name - unless ASF gives you >>> permission to use tomcat name in your product." >> >> Can you point to the proposal you made on tomcat-dev and the vote >> results to your proposal ? >> >> Are you saying you made such a proposal and it was voted down ? >> >> Or it was approved and I didn't allowed you to call it whatever >> tomcat-dev decided ? >> >> My comment was in the context of a product named >> "Tomcat-high-availability" that wasn't voted by the tomcat-dev. It >> doesn't matter if it is a revolution or minimal or whatever it does - it >> shouldn't be named "tomcat-anything" without ASF or tomcat-dev >> permission. >> >> If this proposal doesn't pass I won't do it somewhere else and call it >> tomcat-minimal. > > You're better than me in scavanging through EyeBrowse... :-) It's hard to find something that doesn't exist. I hate the practice of using old postings as arguments in most cases - it's normal for people to change their minds. But in this case you keep making false statements, and not only here. It should be quite easy to look for a [VOTE] or [PROPOSAL] that you made and was voted on tomcat-dev. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: