Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 62936 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2002 02:45:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2002 02:45:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 10959 invoked by uid 97); 1 Mar 2002 02:45:02 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 10824 invoked by uid 97); 1 Mar 2002 02:45:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 10798 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2002 02:45:00 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: dyn-62.sfo.covalent.net: costinm owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 17:28:44 -0800 (PST) From: X-X-Sender: To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [4.0.3] [VOTES] Upcoming release and security fix In-Reply-To: <01d301c1c08b$663dd540$6501a8c0@apache.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > On the security problem reported yesterday, affecting the security manager > sandboxing. We should: > > A [] Make a full 4.0.3 (or 4.0.2a) release which would only include the > security fix > B [+1] Make the security fix available as a binary patch for 4.0.2 (it would > take the form of an archive to extract in $CATALINA_HOME, and would be > *small*) > C [] Accelerate the release schedule of 4.0.3, which would include the > security fix, as well as fixes for other issues with 4.0.2 (with Beta 1 on > 03/01 and Final on 03/08) > > Multiple votes are acceptable. If there are other interesting possibilities, > let me know. > > My vote is 'B'. > > In parallel, I'd like to release a first beta of 4.0.3 on 03/01 (depending > on the vote on item 'C' above, the release cycle may be shorter or longer): > > +1 [+1( jk part )] I support the release, and I will help > +0 [ ] I support the release > -0 [ ] I don't support the release > -1 [ ] I'm against the release because: Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: