Return-Path: 
 <tomcat-dev-return-1930-qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 16639 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2001 00:19:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Dec 2001 00:19:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 281 invoked by uid 97); 2 Dec 2001 00:19:18 -0000
Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 266 invoked by uid 97); 2 Dec 2001 00:19:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tomcat-dev-subscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" <tomcat-dev.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 255 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2001 00:19:17 -0000
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2001 09:19:37 +0900
Message-ID: <87667qeana.wl@arpa.rd.nttdata.co.jp>
From: Takashi Okamoto <toraneko@kun.ne.jp>
To: <costinm@covalent.net>
Cc: Tomcat Developers List <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] about kjc 
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112010845010.1200-100000@localhost.localdomain>
References: <874rnb2h7n.wl@arpa.rd.nttdata.co.jp>
	<Pine.LNX.4.33.0112010845010.1200-100000@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.7.1 (Too Funky) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2
 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.3 Emacs/20.7 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/4.1 (AOI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Hi, Costin.

At Sat, 1 Dec 2001 09:24:59 -0800 (PST),
<costinm@covalent.net> wrote:
> +1 for the patch, but there's something that bothers me - we are starting
> to duplicate what's already present in ant. Next we'll have gcj support,
> etc.
> How difficult would it be to add an 'ant' compiler adapter, that will just
> use the ant <javac> task ? 

Of cource, using ant is better:) It's good idea.
It seems not so difficult. You can use Javac or CompilerAdapterFactory
(and Compiler Adapter) class for it.

> And also use the same ant mechansim, a global property - it's
> possible other tools will need a compiler ( what is cocoon doing ? )
> ?

I don't know recent Cocoon. But cocoon 1.8.x was using just tomcat's
JavaCompiler;)

> This would also allow to automatically compile servlets ( the same
> as jsps are compiled ),

Resin has it already. It's very useful:)

thanks.
----
Takashi Okamoto

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>