Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 21817 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2001 22:03:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Dec 2001 22:03:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 9548 invoked by uid 97); 2 Dec 2001 22:03:32 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 9517 invoked by uid 97); 2 Dec 2001 22:03:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 9506 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2001 22:03:31 -0000 Sender: bojan@binarix.com Message-ID: <3C0AA6FA.5D714EBA@binarix.com> Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 09:11:06 +1100 From: Bojan Smojver Organization: Binarix Corporation Pty Ltd X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.16 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: JK versions References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N costinm@covalent.net wrote: > What I would like to do is make a branch for mod_jk 1.2, and eventually > build a snapshot. If I'm getting this right, you are trying to preserve 1.2 for bug fixing a backward compatibility, while focusing on 2.0. Yes? If so, I'm [+1] for it as it seems very reasonable. Bojan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: