Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 78840 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2001 22:22:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO osaka.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.133) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Oct 2001 22:22:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 23422 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2001 22:25:25 -0000 Received: from nagoya.betaversion.org (192.18.49.131) by osaka.betaversion.org with SMTP; 30 Oct 2001 22:25:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 3829 invoked by uid 97); 30 Oct 2001 22:23:08 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 3816 invoked by uid 97); 30 Oct 2001 22:23:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 3802 invoked by uid 50); 30 Oct 2001 22:23:07 -0000 Date: 30 Oct 2001 22:23:07 -0000 Message-ID: <20011030222307.3801.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4501] - java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.jasper.JasperException when syntax error in JSP page X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4501 java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.jasper.JasperException when syntax error in JSP page remm@apache.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|tomcat- |remm@apache.org |dev@jakarta.apache.org | ------- Additional Comments From remm@apache.org 2001-10-30 14:23 ------- Oh, ok, I get it now. It would only happen with a security manager, though (which is the configuration used by the J2EE RI). include does the same thing. I don't see any reason not to use instanceof here (Glenn, any issues with that ?). -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: