Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sender: glenn@more.net
Message-ID: <3AF849EA.1AEBEED0@voyager.apg.more.net>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 14:32:58 -0500
From: Glenn Nielsen <glenn@voyager.apg.more.net>
Organization: MOREnet
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] Tomcat 4.0 Beta 4 Release
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105071913490.86535-100000@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

+1

I am currently trying to track down a problem related to use of the
SecurityManager with jndi named class/jar files in a web app under
MS Window systems.  It works fine under Unix.

Regards,

Glenn

"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
> 
> Now that the "Proposed Final Draft 2" versions of the Servlet 2.3 and JSP
> 1.2 specs have been published (with Tomcat 4.0 updated to support the
> latest changes), and a ton of bug fixes have been made, I would like to
> propose that we create a "Tomcat 4.0 Beta 4" release as follows:
> 
>   Release Manager:  Craig McClanahan
>   Code Freeze:  Thursday, May 10, 2001 at 05:00pm Pacific Time
> 
> See the file "RELEASE-NOTES-4.0-B4.txt" for a reasonably up-to-date list
> of the changes to date.  This document will be updated with any additional
> changes that are made, plus a list of known outstanding issues.
> 
> Between now and the code freeze, I'd like us to focus on fixing
> outstanding bugs and catching the configuration documentation up to
> date.  I'm OK with continuing work on the new distributed session stuff in
> the mean time (as long as it is not enabled in the default
> configuration), but please hold off on making substantive changes in the
> core container until after the Beta 4 release.
> 
> Comments?  Votes?
> 
> The usual rules apply:
>   [ ] +1 = I agree with this proposal and will support it
>   [ ] +0 = I agree with this proposal, but do not have time to support it
>   [ ] -0 = I do not agree with this proposal, but don't want to try
>            to block it
>   [ ] -1 = I do not agree with this proposal (requires reasons)
> 
> Craig

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Glenn Nielsen             glenn@more.net | /* Spelin donut madder    |
MOREnet System Programming               |  * if iz ina coment.      |
Missouri Research and Education Network  |  */                       |
----------------------------------------------------------------------